Monday, August 14, 2017

HOME PAGE / NOTICES/ LINKS

WELCOME TO AMERICAN ADMIRALTY BOOKS  

                         YOUR PORTAL TO THE MARITIME WORLD

           Presented By Helios Ruehls, Inc.
THE ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLT II OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH VESSEL PHOTO PD    

THE BEST PLACE TO START ANY TYPE OF MARITIME  RESEARCH . 

    

NOTICE NO. 1 NAMAZU IS NOW PRESENTING THE HELIOS RUEHLS, INC. SCIENCE REPORTS IN THESE PAGES. 


NOTICE NO.2:  EVERY AMERICAN OUGHT TO SEE THIS VIDEO:  https://steemit.com/treachery/@lepridan/memo-4-trump-2017222t131514589z
Robert David STEELE explains the "Deep Government" and how Obama / SOROS will launch a violent "American Spring " designed to eliminate Trump via a "soft coup".  Devastating, scary, and seems to have the ring of truth. 




Victory Coffees Logo

 We don't accept advertising, but we back fellow Vets. We like this stuff and think that real sailors will too. You're going to drink coffee, so why not Victory coffee? Made by sailors for sailors.

American Admiralty Books Safety & Privacy Policies   EU VISITORS WARNING POSSIBLE COOKIES AHEAD


THE STATION IDENTIFICATION AND NOTICE BOARD APPEARS AT THE TOP OF THE SCROLL CONTAINING OUR BLOG POSTS IN DAY TIME ORDER.  JUST SCROLL PAST TO READ THE DAILY BLOG POSTS. THE SPECIAL INTEREST PAGE LISTINGS TO YOU RIGHT ARE LIVE LINKS, A CLICK ON THE SUBJECT LINE WILL BRING YOU TO THAT PARTICULAR SPECIAL INTEREST PAGE. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON WHAT THIS SITE IS ABOUT TRY VIEWING THE VIDEO LINKED BELOW OR CLICKING ON OUR INTRODUCTIONSECTION IN THE RIGHT HAND MARGIN.  


NOTICE TO LOUISIANA RESIDENTS: Louisiana charges sales tax on all internet purchases. This site is no longer a vendor of books, there are some links to vendors. Vendors such as Amazon have ceased doing business with Louisiana based blogs and web sites. Louisiana residents are responsible for tracking their internet purchases, computing sales tax due and remitting such to the Louisiana Department of Revenue when they file their state income tax. We do not directly sell nor act as commissioned sales agents for anything on this site: For additional info see "Never Elect Democrats To Public Office"

Thumbnail

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFw32RRJY98    


TO VIEW OUR DAILY BLOG POSTS ON AN ECLECTIC MIX OF MARITIME SUBJECTS SIMPLY SCROLL PAST THIS STATION IDENTIFICATION. OUR POSTS APPEAR ON THIS SCROLL IN DAY TIME ORDER. IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR A PARTICULAR POSTING BY TITLE OR DATE THE LISTS OF POSTS ARE ALSO LIVE LINKS TO YOUR RIGHT. FOR ADDITIONAL HELP IN FINDING A PARTICULAR BLOG CLICK HERE  OR ON THE "SITE GUIDE AND INDEXES" LINE IN THE RIGHT HAND MARGIN.


THINK OF US AS A VAST SPECIALIZED MARITIME LIBRARY 

File:Tampere library shelves.jpg



Photo credit:Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.; Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.




OUR MISSION:

 IS TO HELP OUR VISITORS FIND ALL MANNER OF MARITIME RELATED INFORMATION PROFESSIONAL OR SPORT, AVAILABLE IN ENGLISH INCLUDING LINKS, VIDEOS, AND BOOKS.  WE STRIVE TO CONSTANTLY INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF INFORMATION AVAILABLE HERE AND TO MAKE THE DISCOVERY AND RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION ON YOUR PARTICULAR SUBJECT OF INTEREST EASIER.         


OUR PHILOSOPHY:   We  are an encyclopedic treatment of all things maritime from professional advancement in the naval or Merchant Marine Professions to recreational sailing and paddle sports. Each of our "special interest sections" starts with a basic introduction to the subject then provides you with links to expert sites, reviews of books and videos of interest, links to free pertinent videos that can be viewed on line. While our staff consists of maritime professionals we don't try to duplicate or compete with older more comprehensive special interest sites. We try to help you find them and link to them instantly.  Links to free videos are for videos you can view on line via hyper link providing easy return to this site. While there are links to specialty sites all over this site, we provide below our BIG LINKS LOCKER in case you only came here looking for a link, THE  BIG LINKS LOCKER WILL TAKE YOU TO SPECIALIZED MARITIME SUBJECT MATTER LINKS ALL OVER THE INTERNET:


THE BIG LINKS LOCKER:

American Admiralty Books Safety & Privacy Policies   EU VISITORS WARNING POSSIBLE COOKIES AHEAD

UNLOCKING THE MARITIME WORLD: Our mission is literally to  unlock the maritime world by making all English language maritime data easy to find,  available, evaluated when possible, and affordable. We suggest checking our subject pages to your right first, by clicking on the subject section most like your particular interest.  If that doesn't answer your question come back here and click any of the "super links" below that appear most appropriate, the broadest and most general is hyper linked just below. This is an entire web site of nothing but links to maritime websites and blogs of every description.


"The Mother of All Maritime Links": 
http://www.boat-links.com/boatlink.html 

If you don't find the book you need among those we have reviewed so far or linked to click into the Amazon general search engine via the link below or as provided within our special interest sections.  


GENERAL MARITIME BOOK SEARCH :


We think the following links to major sites aligned with our "Special Interest Pages" can often provide answers to commonly asked questions:

ADMIRALTY or MARITIME LAW:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/admiralty



A NAVAL NEWS CLIPPING SERVICE: NOSI Naval Open Source Intelligence:


OCEANOGRAPHY: The Scripts Institute


SHIP RESEARCH: 


SHIPINDEX.ORG Find publications that mention a particular ship recently or deep into recorded history:  http://www.shipindex.org/  limited free service very reasonable short and long term subscriptions.



Boating and Water Safety:
Mario Vittone-BE SAFEhttp://mariovittone.com/




OUR BUSINESS DAY STARTS WHENEVER YOU ENTER. WE ALWAYS START OUR BUSINESS DAY THE SAME WAY WITH THE NATIONAL ANTHEM:

American Admiralty Books Safety & Privacy Policies   EU VISITORS WARNING POSSIBLE COOKIES AHEAD

Thumbnailhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?

Friday, August 11, 2017

HEART OF OAK: EARLY HISTORY OF THE BRITISH NAVY

THE STORY OF THE 400 YEAR OLD STRUGGLE OF THE BRITISH NAVY AND THE NAVY'S ROLE IN BRINGING GREAT BRITAIN INTO THE FIRST RANK OF NATIONS IN THE MODERN WORLD

File:John Hawkins.JPG
QUEEN ELIZABETH I                                    SIR JOHN HAWKINS

"As treasurer (1577) and comptroller (1589) of the Royal Navy, Hawkins rebuilt older ships and helped design the faster ships that withstood the Spanish Armada in 1588. One of the foremost seamen of 16th-century England, Hawkins was the chief architect of the Elizabethan navy. In the battle in which the Spanish Armada was defeated in 1588, Hawkins served as a vice admiral. He was knighted for gallantry. He later devised the naval blockade to intercept Spanish treasure ships leaving Mexico and South America."-Wikipedia
File:1590 or later Marcus Gheeraerts, Sir Francis Drake Buckland Abbey, Devon.jpg

"Sir Francis Drakevice admiral (c. 1540 – 28 January 1596[3]) was an English sea captainprivateernavigatorslaver[4]and politician of the Elizabethan era. Drake carried out the second circumnavigation of the world in a single expedition, from 1577 to 1580, and was the first to complete the voyage as captain while leading the expedition throughout the entire circumnavigation."
Elizabeth I of England awarded Drake a knighthood in 1581. He was second-in-command of the English fleet against the Spanish Armada in 1588 and a cousin and close confidant of Hawkins."  From Wikipedia

 The people depicted above and whose biographies are linked to took a rag tag aging, and tiny English Navy and started it on its way to becoming a global force which would propel Great Britain into the first rank of nations. HEART OF OAK   is an entertaining but historically accurate video that tells the story of the early rise of the British Navy,  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcKgDRqpMlo. Every Naval history buff should see HEART OF OAK   then stay tuned for the various episodes of EMPIRE OF THE SEAS which follow and bring the story into modern times.

Click here to begin: HEART OF OAK  

Friday, August 4, 2017

IS THE COAST GUARD TOO "CUTTER CENTRIC"? THE GREAT CATFISH EXPLAINS AND DIRECTS YOUR ATTENTION TO A REFERENCED EXPLANATION.

THE GREAT CATFISH RECOMMENDS A NEW LOOK AT COAST GUARD PLATFORMS AND ATTITUDES

NAMAZU, RETIRED JAPANESE GIANT CATFISH DEMIGOD TURNED MARITIME ANALYST
Greetings Bipeds!

 As most of you know by now I'm 3,000 years old and rather fond of tradition and traditional values. But times and circumstances do change and sometimes certain traditions and traditional attitudes no longer serve the needs of the day. I think sailors are wise in usually resisting change until all the evidence for the need is in. However, I do believe that once the need for change is demonstrated change has to be embraced. Sometimes traditionalists embrace totally new and novel approaches in the very name of tradition. One example that I've written about in recent times is the Coast Guard's fixation on its "Deep Water" fleet replacement project. This project is giving the Coast Guard for the first time in over two centuries its own purpose built fleet. The traditionalist fully embrace this initiative which is bringing new cutters into the fleet built from the keel up to Coast Guard specifications. These same traditionalists "cuttermen" seem to have abandoned a tradition centuries in the making. "Craft of Opportunity", sometimes commercial conversions, once captured "rum runners", naval surplus vessels filled out underfunded Coast Guard vessel needs for most of the service's existence one of the many factors that led to the formulation of the old Coast Guard enlisted slogan:

   We the willing, led by the inept, serve the ungrateful. We have been doing so much for so long with so little, that we are now capable of doing almost anything with nothing" .

 The Coast Guard leadership, especially the cutterman community both officer and enlisted seem to have tossed out the old motto for fear that this institutional talent of the Coast Guard, if discovered by Congress, could lead to budget cuts that would endanger the purpose built fleet. This is especially true in the area of ice breaking capacity. Not only has the Coast Guard failed to come up with an affordable purpose built design to increase this much needed service capacity, the service was reluctant to accept Navy assistance in the acquisition process. Some inexpensive commercial conversions are readily apparent on the market that could increase the ice breaker numbers as well as capacities even if each such craft of opportunity was perfect for each task. 

 In the NAVAL INSTITUTE'S PROCEEDINGS , August 2017 edition Lt. David Allan Adams, Jr, USCG takes issue with the entire cutter centric service culture . He notes the many emerging Coast Guard missions that might be better served by other platforms be they high speed smaller vessels, helicopters or other air craft, or even Department of Defense systems. He notes the rise in demand for the Coast Guard's "DOG FORCES" ( Deployable Operations Groups ) and the rising cost of both cutter acquisition, and up keep as well as cutter inefficiencies for certain missions. Among his observations: 

"....today, there are no longer times of war buffered by periods of peace. Instead, these two environments are now dangerously mixed in the “gray zone.” This unique environment demands a unique response that combines the capabilities of both a law enforcement agency and a counter terrorism, special missions team."


"In 2008, Admiral Thad Allen, when taking the helm as commandant of the Coast Guard, understood that we needed “to bring the Coast Guard into the 21st century” and “make it more responsive to the needs of the nation.” He noted that modernization alone would not suffice and that the Coast Guard must be a “change-centric organization.” His Intent to Action Order #1 was to set up the Deployable Operations Group (DOG) to provide properly equipped, trained, and organized Deployable Specialized Forces to Coast Guard, DHS, DOD, and interagency operational and tactical commanders. 10 His attempt to change the way the Coast Guard does business had “many senior officers wringing their hands” but sparked enthusiasm in younger Coasties—enlisted and officer alike." 11

"The Government Accountability Office recently pointed out that the “Coast Guard still has difficulty determining whether it has the right resources for the right missions at the right time . . . which puts the service at risk of repeating past mistakes as it continues to modernize and upgrade its aging flee"

 There will be those who will find the young lieutenant "out of line", and thinking "above his pay grade", and "disrespectful of tradition". As a 3,000 year old observer of history I usually fall into that group....but not this time. The U.S. Coast Guard is taking too long to assert the strong presence in the High Arctic that the United States must have. Domestic port security is not what it should be , and when its time to "loose the 'DOGS' " they seem to be too often either a DOG short or short of a delivery capability of the "DOG" to the scene. Your damn near infallible Catfish urges Coastie policy makers, POTUS, and Congress to read and give careful consideration to "

Coast Guard Is More Than Cutters, now available at: https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2017-08/coast-guard-more-cutters?utm_source=U.S.+Naval+Institute&utm_campaign=87b809d3fe-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_05_10&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_adee2c2162-87b809d3fe-222746633&mc_cid=87b809d3fe&mc_eid=[UNIQID

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

HAPPY BIRTHDAY US COAST GUARD August 4, 1790-August 4, 2017

ON AUGUST 4,1790 THE ANCESTRAL SERVICE OF THE U.S. COAST GUARD WAS FOUNDED IT WOULD NOT TAKE THE NAME "U.S. COAST GUARD" HOWEVER UNTIL 1915.

U.S. Revenue Cutter MASSACHUSETTS entered service 1791 Image USCG, (USCG notes one historic inaccuracy Revenue Ensign and commissioning pennant were not adopted until 1799 after the first MASSACHUSETTS left the service.)


American Admiralty Books Safety & Privacy Policies   EU VISITORS WARNING POSSIBLE COOKIES AHEAD


"In 1790, the First Congress of the United States established a small maritime law enforcement component within the Treasury Department to assist in collecting the new Nation’s customs duties. For the next eight years, this Revenue Marine (later called the Revenue Cutter Service) was the Nation’s only naval force and was soon assigned military duties. Over time, the Revenue Cutter Service merged with or absorbed other federal agencies. The Service acquired new responsibilities based upon its ability to perform them with existing assets and minimal disruption to its other duties. In some cases, the Service absorbed other agencies because their maritime responsibilities were seen as intersecting with or complementing its own. The result is today’s U.S. Coast Guard—a unique force that carries out an array of civil and military responsibilities touching every facet of the maritime environment of the United States." From Coast Guard Publication 1   Feb. 2014. http://www.uscg.mil/doctrine/CGPub/Pub_1.pdf

 The modern day Coast Guard evolved and continues to evolve by the absorption of unique maritime security related missions. In its earliest days some missions were actually assigned to other federal agencies often organized along para-naval lines. The most notable among these predecessor agencies were the U.S. Life Saving Service and the U.S. Light House Service. From its first founding the Revenue Marine was statutorily a part of the Navy in war time but at the moment of its founding there was no standing Navy the Revolutionary Navy having been disbanded. Despite the constitutional requirement for Congress to "maintain a navy", the new navy would not come into existence until some time after the founding of the "Revenue Marine". For a time the ten armed cutters of the "RMS" were the only armed public vessels of the United States. But while the RMS officers held naval rank and the crews held naval ratings, the service could only function under naval direction in war time because it was primarily a law enforcement agency. There early on was a reluctance to utilize military personnel in law enforcement in the United States and eventually it would become a statutory prohibition called the Posse Comitatus Act. So the "Revenue Marine" would continue as a naval auxiliary military service but would be housed in the Treasury Department vice the War or Navy Departments. The entire service or any component within it could be transferred to naval control in war or upon order of the President of the United States. 

Parallel with the development of the military / law enforcement agency known as the "Revenue Marine" other federal maritime agencies of a quasi naval character were evolving. The U.S. Light House Service evolved from the United States Lighthouse Establishment (USLHE)also serving under the treasury department and founded in 1789. Officers of the Revenue Marine served on the Light House Board.  The highly disciplined U.S. Life Saving Service was also evolving parallel with the Revenue Marine. On 28 January 1915, the service was merged by an act of Congress with the United States Life-Saving Service to form the United States Coast Guard. The U.S. Coast Guard would then go on to absorb several other federal marine safety and security related agencies including the U.S. Light House Service. 

 Many of the civil missions of these "predecessor agencies" once brought under the administration of the newly formed "U.S. Coast Guard" became not only domestic waters civil missions but also naval combat support missions. The institutional experience of the Coast Guard in saving lives through heavy surf was translated in World War Two into amphibious warfare roles involving the use of landing craft through surf. In Vietnam not only was the U.S. Coast Guard's expertise in board and search operations honed on its domestic law enforcement missions brought into play, but also the Guard provided aids to navigation services within the combat zone, again a domestic civil mission with military utility.  January 28, 2015 was the 100th anniversary of the U.S. Coast Guard name , Today August 4th, 2015 is the 225 anniversary of the founding of the Revenue Marine , considered the primary predecessor agency and long celebrated as the "Birthday" of the U.S. Coast Guard, now a 100 year old brand. 

                                            HAPPY BIRTDACOAST GUARD! 

Friday, July 28, 2017

WHAT TO DO WHEN A CREW MEMBER DIES AT SEA


Armstrong Burial at Sea
Commitment of  the cremated remains of Neil Armstrong to sea during a burial at sea service held on board the USS Philippine Sea (CG 58), Friday, Sept. 14, 2012, in the Atlantic Ocean. Image Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls

 Admiralty law has long recognized internment at sea as one of the "perils of the sea" that crew and passengers alike, of necessity, agree to endure if necessary when signing on as crew or booking passage as a passenger. Until well past the middle of the 20th century it more often than not made sense. Few ships had the know how or the facilities to preserve a body for very long. Today by contrast large commercial ocean transports often have facilities for rather lengthy body preservation (upwards of two weeks) and smaller offshore support craft are usually within the  medical evacuation distance of coast guard helicopters and patrol vessels. While internment of human remains at sea can still be a necessity on rare occasions, generally most commercial maritime transport lines prefer to refrain from the practice unless the deceased family formally requests such final disposal in writing. 
If you are one of our merchant marine deck officer readers we sincerely hope that you never have to deal with this issue. But the distinct possibility always exists. That is why every master or chief officer should know the things we outline for you below. Disposal of human remains in haste can cause legal problems, survivor family distress, personal and corporate liabilities. Keep the following in mind.

Know your ship's facilities that could prove helpful in the event of sudden crew member or passenger death. Have a plan ready in advance. Should you have to deal with an unexpected death of a crewman or passenger at sea immediate action must be taken to preserve the body and show respect to the deceased and their families. Showing respect at all times is especially important, preservation of the body is especially important if the ship is some days or even weeks from a port where the body may be disembarked and shipped home.  Respect should include a sort of "wake" in which the body is laid out, out of the weather and respectful crew and /or passenger  viewing is permitted under the watchful eye of at least one of the ships officers. Often the deceased may have friends or even relatives aboard. Prayers may be offered at this time which generally should happen very soon after death is discovered and before body preservation efforts begin. 

 Body Preservation Efforts Generally Should Not Include Freezing:  

 When bodies are frozen the tissues dehydrate and discoloration of the skin ensues. This discoloration can make the body difficult for relatives to identify and cause family members a great deal of distress. Shore side authorities should be contacted as soon after death is discovered as possible and shore side authority should contact the family. As the responsible ship's officer however you should not assume the shore side shipping company office, or even naval authorities have any real grasp of the complications of death at sea. If you are a long way from a port and the only choices may be between "burial at sea" and freezing the body, the ship's officer should fully brief his shore side contact on the situation and on the effects of freezing on a body. Families who choose freezing, and many will, are best served if the deteriorated condition of the body is not a surprise. Among the other potential problem with freezing the deceased is fracture. Fractures to frozen corpses may negatively impact coroner's investigations and complicate medical and legal interpretation of post mortem investigative results. Additionally frozen bodies must be carefully thawed before medical examination, adding additional delay to the release of the body to the family of the deceased.

REFRIGERATION OF CORPSES IS PREFERRED TO FREEZING: 
 A human body placed in a commercial "body bag" or plastic wrapping of similar  quality might be kept as long as 60 days if refrigerated 39 degrees Fahrenheit  (4 degrees Celsius) . Most full size ocean transport vessels, and military transports will have large walk in refrigerated spaces. Properly wrapped, storing the body in the same space with food items should not be problem, so long as refrigeration systems do not fail. On smaller vessels this may not be an option. On something like a commercial fishing vessel a well wrapped body might be stored over some ice and under a light cover of ice but this is no substitute for refrigeration but should allow a couple of days to make land fall or helicopter range. The deceased family should be made aware of the increased risk of damage including the possibility of accidental freezing. There can be no guarantees when a body is iced down.   

EMOTIONAL ISSUES:
 Once a death at sea occurs, there will probably be emotional issues to deal with from both crew aboard and family ashore. After notification of death the family may request certain religious or cultural customs be observed. These requests are sometimes simple and the USPHS publication THE MEDICINE CHEST AT SEA has some guidelines that may prove helpful at least with Christian and Jewish requests, but resources and people at sea are always limited and the responsible officer should be honest concerning which requests can or can not be performed. In the case of small crews or whenever the deceased had friends aboard it may be advisable to have a grief counselor visit the ship upon landing. This precaution is especially pertinent in the event of an on board suicide.

 Another emotional and legal issue is disposition of the property of the deceased. All property of the deceased should be inventoried by two officers and one rating or enlisted if appropriate. On a commercial passenger ship the aid of a passenger with a legal back ground should be enlisted in completing the inventory and containerizing the property. In the case of ship's personnel be sure to account for all licenses and seaman's certificates.

TODAY, DISPOSING OF THE BODY AT SEA IS DISFAVORED UNLESS THE DECEASED FAMILY SPECIFICALLY REQUESTS THE SERVICE IN WRITING OR THERE SIMPLY IS NO OTHER CHOICE. IMPROPER CARE OF THE BODY OR SLOPPY CONTROL OF THE DECEASED PERSONAL PROPERTY ARE LEADING CAUSES OF FAMILY DISTRESS AND RESULTANT LAW SUITES IN THE EVENT OF DEATH AT SEA. IF THERE IS ONE UNIVERSAL GUIDE THAT COVERS ALL SIZED VESSELS IT IS SIMPLY HANDLE THE BODY AND THE PERSONAL PROPERTY OF THE DECEASED WITH UTMOST CARE AND CAUTION AND COMMUNICATE CARE, AND CONCERN TO THE FAMILY ASHORE BY WHATEVER MEANS AVAILABLE, HOWEVER ,  LEAVE SUCH COMMUNICATIONS TO SHORE SIDE PERSONNEL AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.  THE BEST WAY EXPRESS SUCH CARE AND CONCERN IS VIA MESSAGES DELIVERED BY YOUR SHORE SIDE SUPPORT  SYSTEM, NOT VIA SAT PHONE OR RADIO DIRECTLY TO THE FAMILY. IF YOUR MESSAGE REQUIRES ANY EDITING TO PRESERVE LEGAL PROTECTIONS, OR SOFTEN NEWS THE SHORE SIDE PERSONNEL HAVE ACCESS TO LAWYERS, COUNSELORS, AND OTHER EXPERTS.
THIS SITUATION IS ALWAYS COMPLEX AND PERSONALLY CHALLENGING. DON"T FORGET TO PRAY FOR GUIDANCE BECAUSE EACH SITUATION IS DIFFERENT, NO ONE GUIDE FITS ALL. 










Thursday, July 27, 2017

COMBAT PLANNING REQUIRES AN ECONOMY OF ERGONOMICS WHICH REQUIRES GENDER CONSTANCY

WHY TRANSGENDER PEOPLE REPRESENT A THREAT TO MILITARY READINESS

The Great Catfish Explains:

NAMAZU, FORMER JAPANESE GIANT CATFISH DEMIGOD TURNED ANALYST AND COMMENTATOR

IT'S NOT JUST THE EXPENSE,  IT'S THE HOLE IN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT THEY CREATE: GENDER CONSTANCY IS NEEDED IN AN ACTIVITY THAT REQUIRES CAREFUL ERGONOMIC PLANNING. 

Greetings Bipeds!

 Your President Trump has once again ignored political correctness and embraced common sense which of course has now gotten him in trouble with the main stream media liberal progressive propaganda machine. Most people are aware that transgender operations cost a fortune and that military members on active duty enjoy free health care. So there is some sympathy for the argument that the tax payers can't afford these super expensive elective operations. Given their expense and the benefit of free medical care in the military, the idea of getting a transgender operation for free could be a powerful incentive for transgender people to seek military employment. But the expense of the initial evaluation, pre- transitional care, and finally gender changing operation is just the start of the expense. Everyone is aware that there is no such thing as a fertile transgender. The gender change is never fully complete. To maintain the so called "changed" gender the transgender person must take an extensive cocktail of hormone tablets, sometimes injections, and secondary sex characteristics suppression  drugs, as well as considerable cosmetic practices. The transgender condition could be medically described as "elective chronic". Other people in need of expensive operations and an expensive continuum of care (serious chronic conditions)  are not eligible for military service, why should the tax payer be charged for those with an elective chronic condition?  Yet the horrific expense is just the tip of the ice burg of the problems the employment of transgenders present to military systems , especially in the management of human resources. 

  There should be only one end goal in the management of military human resources, military readiness resulting in winning in combat and rapid, successful completions of military missions other than war.  The problem of transgenders is in the planning. Consider the ergonomics of firefighting as a typical example. 

 Firefighting teams are important naval teams in shipboard damage control situations and are made up of active duty naval personnel. In an intense firefight a lot of equipment and supplies weighing in the vicinity of 65 pounds must be muscled about. The NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health ) standard for repetitive , asymmetrical (other than bent knee straight up lifting) for men is 65 pounds but only about half that for women. An all woman shipboard firefighting team would be rather ineffective compared to a male dominant team. In the modern navy as well as on the modern U.S. Air Force flight line an all male firefighting team is hard to come by so military managers try to plan for a male dominant team. This works as long as gender is a constant. 

 Unfortunately, among the things that do change for transgender people is that male to female transgenders do get weaker as a result of desired weight loss for body conformation, and the effect of injected or ingested female hormones. By contrast female to male transitions at best may achieve gains that would put them in the weaker population percentiles for males. One of the "controls" to prevent injuries recommended by NIOSH is physical training. The truth is that the typical male firefighter military or civilian is usually much stronger than the average male. Female firefighters after physical training may approach the bottom percentile of the males with always some notable exceptions. However, if gender is not constant, how do you plan for such forces. How do military flag, general and commanding officers, or even small unit leading non commissioned officers plan for longer term operations if in fact the ratios of male to female members aren't static because gender isn't constant? 

 One of the snowflake arguments in favor of transgender service is that they estimate that somewhere between 2500 and to over 7,000 transgenders are actively serving in the military today. The very numbers they cite are a serious reason for stopping the madness now. Those numbers are easily high enough to affect medical budgets as well as the planning of ergonomic economics for human composition of force elements. The firefighting teams example is just one of many such situations in force planning where gender ratios are critical due to the manifest difference in upper torso strength between men and women. But that's not the only area where a lack of gender constancy becomes a military human resources planning problem. In aviation for example women are scientifically shown to suffer less from green / red color blindness then men ( also a concern in naval navigation bridge operations`). Going back as far as WWII this gender difference has proven of utility in increasing pilot populations. Transgenders resent being referred to as a third gender and identify with their assumed through surgery gender. But the cross overs still bring with them the color blindness ratios of their birth gender.

 Believe me the list of problems that transgender tolerance in the ranks imposes on military human resource planners and combat commanders is truly exhaustive. President Trump was right to stop the madness. For over 200 years this was not an issue in the American armed forces. Only the last eight years , the years of OBOZO have transgender people in any numbers been allowed in the U.S. Military. During his years of using the military as a social experiment the numbers blossomed to the joy of the snowflakes and the consternation of the professional military. 

 There is no doubt that the Commander in Chief has every legal right to establish service eligibility requirements. This is not a matter for the Congress, the Media, or Judiciary.  However, the loud concern expressed for those transgenders presently in service is unnecessary. There are enlistment contracts, and service agreements involved, there are litigate-able  retirement system vesting issues involved as well as the practical problems of replacing trained and experienced people even if we believe they can and will be replaced eventually by less expensive to maintain people who no longer present the military with the planning problems created by gender inconstancy. The most likely outcome  of the change in policy, which is after all, as announced, and focused on initial enlistment or commissioning is a eventual reduction in transgender service members through natural attrition.

 Some joined who joined simply to get the medical procedures for gender change always intended to opt out at the end of their initial enlistment, not unlike some who enter for the educational veterans benefits. Some will now leave in anger over the non PC policy and distinct turn away from being a social experimental human population that the services will take under a pragmatic Commander in Chief. Some will retire before a distinct retention policy for serving transgenders is articulated. Some that supervisors might actually like to release to the civilian population but who want to stay on may be retained due to needs of the service. But eventually the Obama created "pig in the python" human resources problem will pass mostly through relatively painless natural attrition. Buck up snowflakes, the Commander in Chief has this one under control.

READ MORE @ http://conservativetribune.com/trans-man-brutal-truth-trumps-ban/2/http://conservativetribune.com/trans-man-brutal-truth-trumps-ban/2/

Monday, July 24, 2017

YOU NEXT NEW PRESIDENT COULD BE YOUR LAST UNDER THE CONSTITUTION


 THE GREAT NAMAZU ISSUES A WARNING TO AMERICA: 

INTRODUCING ABDUL EL-SAYED, AN AMERICAN BORN MUSLIM PROBABLY  HAND PICKED BY GEORGE  & PAUL SOROS TO BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.



The Great Namazu Exclaims: "DO NOT ELECT THIS MAN OR ANYONE LIKE HIM TO EVEN THE OFFICE OF DOG CATCHER!" 

El-Sayed and his wife as depicted in the quoted & linked article from Olive Extra THE NEXT OBAMA

"El-Sayed is supported by Muslim Brotherhood and all of their terrorist affiliates. I’m sure that the Left is hoping that President Trump will be a one termer. Dr. el-Sayed will be running for Governor of Michigan in 2018.  You know, the state where Dearborn has been referred to as “Dearbornistan” for many years now. This city has no-go areas for the police.  And if you would visit Dearborn, you might think that you were in an Arabic country." Quoted from OLIVE EXTRAS in an article titled THE NEXT OBAMA


"Dick Manasseri, spokesman for Secure Michigan, a group that educates Michiganders about the threat of Shariah law, predicts that Sayed will at least win the Democratic nomination for governor." Quoted from Olive Extras, THE NEXT OBAMA

Manasseri also noted: Any Republican would be afraid to confront him on his Muslim Brotherhood connections or his views on Shariah,” Manasseri said. “He is a devout Shariah-compliant guy, ......."

 With most Americans blind to the Islamification of America, all that is needed to galvanize the strange leftist coalition of liberals, LGBT, secular humanists, socialists, media, and Muslims is a young , good looking, highly educated, and articulate Muslim politician who knows how to lie to the Kafar (Non Muslims) . Enter George Soros and brother Paul , men with billions of dollars who appear dedicated to the overthrow of the constitutional government of the United States, and their alleged  hand picked American presidential wanna be  Dr. "Abul El-Sayed", MD presently a candidate for governor of Governor of Michigan, a state with several communities already under virtual Sharia Law,

 Abdul El Sayed's full name is Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed,  that should be the first tip off to the fringe element in the electorate that is needed to make this man governor of Michigan or as planned by George Soros , et al, President of the United States as soon after Mohamed makes the minimum qualifying age of 35 as possible. The governorship is meant by Soros et al as a stepping stone to the highest office in the land. Needless to say,Mohamed El-Sayed aka "Abdul" or maybe he will go by "Al" is a registered democrat and is running as governor under the democratic banner. Mohamed is totally without the executive background to run a state but by all accounts is a brilliant Epidemiologist. He did serve for two years as Executive Director of the Detroit Health Department. He was 30 years old at the time of his appointment and the youngest doctor to serve as Health commissioner for a major city. But then it is Detroit, virtually a third world city state run by the democratic party as financed and defined by George Soros. Prior to that, Mohammed was an Assistant Professor in the department of Epidemiology at Columbia University. You may recall that other possibly American Muslim alumni of Columbia Barrack Hussein Obama who I think went to Columbia as a foreign exchange student supposedly from Kenya under the name of "Barry" something or other.

 Already the main stream media is busy obscuring the the SOROS connection or the candidate's devotion to Sharia law.  TRUTH OR FICTION .com a so called Internet verification service calls the claims of connections between Addulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed and George Soros , the Muslim Brotherhood et al "Mostly false". But they can only cite the fact that they couldn't find a direct corporate connection between George Soros and the fund that granted Mohamed a fellowship which is run by George's brother Paul Soros. After much back peddling and unfounded critical comment TRUTH OR FICTION.com did note:  "Abdul El-Sayed , the now 32 -year -old public health physician and epidemiologist, earned a doctorate from Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar before earning a medical degree from Columbia University as a Paul and daisy SOROS Fellow. "  This is exactly our point the man is an undeniably Sharia compliant Muslim with Connections to the Soros dominated American Democratic party and an education funded in part by the SOROS family. We absolutely can not have a man such as this in any public office in America much less as governor of a state or especially as President of the nation. As a Sharia compliant Muslim he is bound by supposedly "religious duty" to over throw the constitution of the United States and do all in his power to impose Sharia law.  He is also permitted by his "religions' guidance in its most holy scripture to lie to any and all non Muslims if it furthers the cause of Islam in the world. What is the cause of Islam in the world? World domination under a system of Sharia Law.

 Why should Americans be leery of anyone with a SOROS's connection? Consider this from Economists Paul Krugman who said in 1999: "In 1999, economist Paul Krugman was critical of Soros's effect on financial markets. No body who has read a business magazine in the last few years can be unaware that these days there really are investors who not only move money in anticipation of a currency crisis, but actually do their best to trigger that crisis for fun and profit. These new actors on the scene do not yet have a standard name; my proposed term is 'Soroi" Soros has been convicted in the French courts of violating insider trading laws. His politics are a matter of open record: Soros donated $1 million to the super PAC backing Barack Obama's reelection "Priorities USA Action. He donated $25,000 to "Ready Hillary" becoming co-chair of the Super PAC's finance committee. Then in June 2015 he donated $1 million to the Super Pac "Priorities USA" which supported Hillary in the 2016 presidential race. Soros donated $6 million to the PAC in December 2015, and $2.5 million in August  2016. This is just the publicly visible tip of the recent ice burg of financial support to the most radical elements in the Democratic party. 


 The Muslim watchdog Manasseri noted that recently the Michigan Legislature defeated a bill supporting that only American law be applied in American courts, outlawing, without naming it Sharia law, from private or public dispute resolution. Two powerful lobbies making extremely strange bed fellows or fellow travelers defeated the law. CAIR, the Council on American -Islamic Relations, an organization which has had a number of senior members and directors with known affiliations to Hamas, which only was de-certified as a terrorist organization by the action of former President Obama; opposed the legislation as did the Michigan Catholic Conference which may have unreasonably feared that their marriage annulment tribunals may have been at risk.  

 Dr. El-Sayed is not ready to represent Americans other than Muslim Americans, and Muslim Americans are all too often, but not always, openly hostile to the Constitution of the United States and the religious preferences of their non Muslim fellow citizens. Now is not the time for non Muslim Americans to be voting for even suspected cultural Jihadists.