NAMAZU
American Admiralty Books Safety & Privacy Policies EU VISITORS WARNING POSSIBLE COOKIES AHEAD
(Earthquakes and tsunamis are part of the Japanese psyche. Living as they do on islands floating on the grinding of the Pacific tectonic plates, both are common occurrences. Mystical explanations helped explain the apparently random and frightening events. This image shows the giant catfish, Namazu, whose wiggling tail causes earth tremors and giant waves. Namazu is mostly kept under control by the god Kashima. But when Kashima is tired or distracted, Namazu flicks his tail and rattles the earth.)
I may have more bile than I need
this morning. It is quite a remarkable thing to have a once trusty
appendage suddenly collapse on you. It defies all experience,
suddenly looking up from the floor. But I think it will get better.
I hope so- it is remarkable to feel
so good one moment and then be writhing in pain the next. There must
be an explanation for it. I am inclined to think it might have
been the flicking of Namazu’s tail that catapulted me into this
strange alternate reality.
You heard about the tornedo in
Dexter, Michigan, last week. It was horrendous, though thank God no
one died. My buddy Muhammed lives in Ann Abor, not far from the
epicenter of the activity. He said: “We got good hail out of it.
Dexter had a lot of damage, probable F3 Tornados. Weather is
wild here!”
“It
hit 75 and humid here today, what a contrast. Really awesome to see
Nature at work! When the atmosphere, the ground (being mined and
drilled), the thoughts of people are out of balance. Then, things get
put back in balance. The weather guy calls it physics. Maybe
it is.” He concluded with the observation that he thinks “it is
Spirit at work.”
“As
you know, it is easy to "dis" religion. But no one I have
ever seen or talked to thinks about Science when a possible
Tornado approaches, people pray. It works. Let's
just say I was not standing on my front porch doing Physics problems
60 minutes ago.”
I was thinking the other day that hurricanes have
diminished in number and intensity, even though our ability to track
them has increased measurably. An early Spring here- with the usual
attendant savagery of the change of season- is matched by a late and
record-breaking winter in Alaska, and snows in Europe that range as
far south as North Africa.
Is it La Nina? Sunspots or the
lack of them? The regular precession of the wobbling earth?
I liked this explanation this
morning, and I try on belief systems. As you know, the earth's orbit
around the sun is not quite circular. The closest approach of earth
to the sun is called “perihelion,” and it now occurs in January,
making northern hemisphere winters slightly milder. This change in
timing of perihelion is known as the precession of the equinoxes, and
occurs on a period of 22,000 years.
11,000 years ago, perihelion
occurred in July, making the seasons more severe than today.
Add in the fact that our planet is
not round. Our earthly hotel has an orbit that varies on cycles of
100,000 and 400,000 years, and this affects how important the timing
of perihelion is to the relative strength of the seasons.
The combination of the 41,000 year
tilt-cycle and a 22,000 year precession cycle affect the relative
severity of summer and winter, and may control the growth and retreat
of ice sheets. Cool summers in the northern hemisphere, where most of
the earth's land mass is located, appear to allow snow and ice to
persist to the next winter, allowing the development of large ice
sheets over hundreds to thousands of years.
Conversely, warmer summers shrink
ice sheets by melting more ice than the amount accumulating during
the winter.
That is the Milankovitch Theory,
anyway, which was thought up by a Serbian scientist named Milutin
Milankovitch back in 1920, which means he does not have a dog in the
current argument about Anthropomorphic Global Warming, or its
cousin, Catastrophic AGW.
The legion of things we do not
understand about how climate and weather work- they are of course not
the same- and whether the current theory on CO2 emissions is correct
is something else. There are Greenhouse gases, of course. But
what exactly is it they do? We have Dr. Mann's hockey stick graphic.
How does that work with everything else?
I listened to Dr. Michael Mann
flacking his new book the other day on NPR, and he spent
precious little time on anything like science. Apparently he solved
all this stuff a long time ago, and he has moved on mostly to policy
recommendations, something that the Ivory Tower has always prided
itself on.
I am no “denier,” as the
current vituperative discourse goes. Of course the
climate is changing, and of course the greenhouse
effect has been known for a long time. Look at the evidence:
Global temperatures- to the extent that we have them without
resorting to pine cones and buried logs from Siberia- have increased
almost a full degree (Celsius) since 1840.
Dr. Mann says there is a tipping
point, we may have hit it already, and urgent action is required. I
got an idea of what that might be in the form of a thoughtful piece
by a fellow named Gary Stix. He laid it out in the pages of
Scientific American this morning. He is wrestling with some heavy
stuff. He is calling for immediate and massive social change.
"Global
prosperity now depends on our species' success at a totally
unfamiliar assignment: to "fit" our many billions of people
on this small planet, with its finite resources and finite capacity
to withstand pollution. The job will be very hard and will require
sustained focus…
Behavioral
economics and other forward-looking disciplines in the social
sciences try to grapple with weighty questions. But they have never
taken on a challenge of this scale, recruiting all seven billion of
us to act in unison…. In principle, species-wide alteration in
basic human behaviors would be a sine qua non, but that kind of
pronouncement also profoundly strains credibility in the chaos of the
political sphere....How do we create new institutions with
enforcement powers way beyond the current mandate of the U.N.? Could
we ensure against a malevolent dictator who might abuse the power of
such organizations?"
Sounds like fun, but "Whoa," I thought. “Of
course not. The only inevitability in this warming or cooling
globe is that the over-arching ego of the human species won’t
change. The most powerful emotion is not that of reproduction, but to
tell others what to do.
Oh, BTW, Gary is not a climate
scientist, according to the home page of Scientific American. His job
is to: "Commission, write, and edit features, news articles and
Web blogs.... His area of coverage is neuroscience. He also has
frequently been the issue or section editor for special issues or
reports on topics ranging from nanotechnology to obesity.”
More help from another quarter- a
neurological approach to AGW. Let's get cracking, shall we?
Oh, yeah. What does the
Milankovitch Theory say about future climate change? That good doctor
claimed that orbital changes occur over thousands of years, and the
climate system may also take thousands of years to respond to orbital
forcing.
Is this urgent? Could it be that
AGW actually fending off the next ice age? I dunno.
Dr. Mann and Gary Stix seem
pretty worked up about it, and I guess I am, too. I am thinking that
that pesky Namazu is working up for a quiver of his tail. Maybe
we should all run to the other side of the tilted earth's axis?
Copyright 2012 Vic Socotra
www.vicsocotra.com
Click here for a video on the climate change debate, click on the return arrow in the upper left corner of the YouTube tool bar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAj
Click here for a video on the climate change debate, click on the return arrow in the upper left corner of the YouTube tool bar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAj
This was a good explanation of the many natural causes besides human industrial activity that can cause climate change, some very rapidly. It seems to us that climate change, especially relatively rapid climate change, is not a question of if, but when. It's not even a question of how we can cause it, because nature doesn't need us, to create drastic and sudden climate change.
ReplyDeleteWhile we shouldn't neglect attention to reducing humankind's carbon foot print, the real question that governments should be asking themselves is how to plan to minimize negative consequences when the inevitable happens. Arctic marine transport is an immediate naval and merchant marine issue of the moment, but as drought and temperature change, governments and agrabusiness, and municiple authorities need to be thinking about food security. We have the technology today to produce vast quantities of fruits and vegetables in a factory like setting in highly urbanized areas. If governments including municipal governments were to encourage such production cities would be more secure if large areas of agricultural production were to lose a crop.
When NASA looks at space colonies their ideas of self sustaining production of animal protein don't include cows. NASA looks at aquaculture, and such small meat producing species as quail and rabbit. These sources lend themselves to indoor production. This article points to the many ways that climatic disaster may befall us and has befallen our ancestors in the long ago past. We have the technology to not have to slip back into the stone age. We have the technology to avoid massive die offs of human beings. What we lack is a plan and a committment to act based on the very realistic expectation that no matter waht is happening now, be it simply periodic natural change, or human activity induced change, climate change will happen at some point and may be sudden even if we produced an emission free industrial world. All it takes is sun spots, orbit wobble, extensive volcanism, or a meteor strike or any combination of the above. We should be planning and acting now on the firm belief that it will eventually happen.