Saturday, September 17, 2016

TRUMP WON BIG ENOUGH TO OVERCOME THE ANTICIPATED VOTER FRAUD



Barack Obama Voter Fraud 2012 

Illustration from the Barack Obama Voter Fraud 2012 Website: http://obamavoterfraud.blogspot.com/

 We have very little doubt that there was massive Democratic voter fraud in 2012 and that while there was something of a movement at the grassroots level to try to get it corrected, it was too little too late. Once in office the Obama administration certainly wasn't going to do anything to correct the situation and the main stream media quickly buried the issue. Now with the 2016 presidential election past and the Democrats alleging everything from voter fraud to Russian interference to explain their loss it seems a good time to revisit the voter fraud issue. Its also time for the  Republican party to make plans to insure that their future candidates get a fair count. Democratic voter fraud must be anticipated since it is more probably than not something that occurred in the 2012 presidential election and has never been corrected. Our own Namazu posted the following examples from his research in an earlier post. Here we want to draw our readers to other sources and other incidents as well. We don't have the resources of the Government or the mainstream media, neither of which will make any attempt to "prove", much less correct the appearance of massive Democratic voter fraud. But in our opinion any reasonable person who looks at even a fraction of the evidence and indicators would have to conclude that Democratic Voter Fraud in the last Presidential election was "more probable than not". That is a sufficient level of proof to win a civil case and ample reason for the Trump administration and the Republican party to take extra and studiously efficient precautions against a repeat of this sorry history. Of all the facts that we find incriminating the simplest, most undeniable, fact is this:

OBAMA WON IN EVERY STATE WITHOUT A VOTER PICTURE ID REQUIREMENT. HE LOST IN EVERY STATE THAT HAD A VOTER PICTURE ID REQUIREMENT. THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS HISTORICALLY STOOD FOURSQUARE AGAINST VOTER ID REQUIREMENTS. 

 Here are the observations from Namazu's earlier post:

1. In the Obama / Romney contest in key parts of the Greater Philadelphia area, Obama received 100% of the vote , without a single recorded vote for Romney, a mathematical and statistical near impossibility. 

2. In 21 voting districts in Wood County, Ohio Obama received 100% of the vote after Republican poll monitors were forcefully and illegally removed. Not a single vote was recorded for Romney, again a mathematical and statistical near impossibility.

3. In the same Wood county 106,258 voted in a county with only 98,213 eligible registered voters. 

4. In St. Lucie County, Florida there were 175,574 registered voters but 247,713 votes were cast.

5. Palm Beach County , Florida had a 141% voter turnout.

6. In one Ohio county , Obama won by 108% of the total number of eligible voters.

7. Obama won in every state that did not require a photo ID to vote and lost in every state that did.

Here are some more observations from various sources: 


Philly Polling Stations Where GOP Inspectors Were Kicked Out Had 90% Voter Turnout, 99% Voted For Obama… (PA) (Black Panthers kicked out the GOP observers and stood guard at the polling stations .)


via @BeachCity55 on Twitter: Senior parents in Florida told not to put their ballots through their reader but in a box. Senior votes in FL not counted? (FL)














 After Trump won the Electoral College vote and claimed the Presidency the Democrats immediately challenged the election and demanded several state recounts. The recounts may have been indicative of Democratic Party voter fraud because each recount actually turned up a larger majority for Trump. The Democrats made a big issue of supposedly Hillary "winning the popular vote:" However, if one subtracts the California vote, a state she did carry, she loses the "popular vote" by a considerable margin. Why eliminate the California vote? You may have noticed that the Hillary forces did not ask for a recount there or any other investigation that would touch on the California vote. You see California issues driver's licenses without demanding proof of citizenship and yet has a "motor voter law". So in a state with a porous border with Mexico , an abundance of "sanctuary cities", and doubtless tens of thousands of illegal aliens allowed to vote, certainly the Democrats don't want to see any bright white lights turned on the California electorate. There must be an elimination of "motor voter laws in states" which do not require proof of citizenship for the issuance of driver's licenses. In any state where there has been serious evidence of voter fraud in the last decade such as California, Florida, and Ohio picture ID and proof of citizenship should be required by Federal official poll watchers in all Federal elections until those states address their issues of lax voter fraud prevention. 


Help this go viral. America needs to know how pervasive voter fraud was in the 2012 election, and that nothing has been done about it since. Look at the mainstream media polls before the 2016 Presidential election. Depending on which polls you believed at the time (MSM Clinton ahead by 1 to 2 %, others ,Trump ahead by as much as 4%, Political T shirt and hat sales 70% for Trump merchandise and about 28% for Clinton. Remember the popular vote doesn't elect a president, the Electoral College does. Win in certain key states and a candidate who lost the popular vote by a small margin can take office. 
The Democrats may well have stolen Ohio, Florida, and Massachusetts, and possibly Colorado in 2012. We may never know what they stole in 2016 because Trump won by a big enough margin to overcome the effect of Democratic voter fraud. Is it unreasonable to be prepared to contest these states legally, monitor their poles closely before the next Federal Elections?  Who will do this if not the Trump Administration and the Republican party? The immediate past administration more probably than not was run by the beneficiaries of the last fraud.  

Then there is the whinny Democrats lament that Russia and not "whistle blowers" released the Hillary E-mails? Stop and think a minute. It was the contents stupid! If she had not written damaging things the release by anyone wouldn't have mattered. The contents of those E-mails and the use of unclassified routing for classified material is what was so damaging to her reputation as a potential Commander in Chief. No matter who exposed them, she wrote them. Get over it leftards! And, go ahead and continue buying guns, we pragmatists, constitutionalists, and conservatives ( and other "deplorables") fully support your 2nd amendment rights. But if you think that you're going to use those arms to force your globalist, socialist, agnostic agenda on us....remember we were armed first, have a much larger proportion of military veterans among us, are better trained, and out number you.  Really, get over it leftards, you've already embarrassed your selves before all the decent tax paying reasonable people,  don't go getting your butts shot to ribbons. We've lost elections to your factions based on massive voter fraud and never threatened you. Learn to play the game or get off the playing field of democracy.  

1 comment: