The U.S. Coast Guard's Big Ice Breaker POLAR STAR Works Long Past Retirement Age..
CGC POLAR STAR, PHOTO USCG |
This year let us hope the aging ship does not fail. The POLAR STAR's equally old sister ship the POLAR SEA has been down with engine problems since 2010 and some say while not decommissioned yet she is actually being cannibalized for parts to keep the POLAR STAR going. The Coast Guard's only other seagoing ice breaker is the CGC ALEX HALEY a medium endurance ice breaker meant for Arctic work. The National Science Foundation has a light endurance ice breaker. The Russians already laying claim to the entire Arctic Ocean and can move around it at will being in possession of 18 icebreakers, four of which are nuclear powered heavy duty types. Russia has already announced the construction of yet another heavy icebreaker to help supply Russia's growing Arctic military presence and to lead Russian warships into the ice flows.
Frankly without U.S. heavy icebreakers control of the Arctic belongs to Russia. The Arctic is thought to hold more than 10% of the global undiscovered oil reserves, one third of undiscovered gas reserves, and is a strategically critical region for U.S. security. Yet despite the fact that the nation's sole remaining operational heavy icebreaker could break down from old age at any moment there are no replacement plans. It has been estimated that a replacement for the POLAR STAR could run over one billion dollars. Certainly built in the U.S. as is the norm for U.S. military vessels that is a conservative estimate.We think it is time to think outside the box. Every Arctic and Antarctic mission doesn't require the capacity of the POLAR STAR. There are a number of small 1600 to 2,000 gross ton icebreaking offshore supply / service vessels available for sale at used prices of only a few million dollars on the world market. Time to drop the purpose built in America rule and pick up several of these in serviceable condition. They will be grossly inadequate for some POLAR STAR missions but more than adequate for others. Once painted in the USCG colors and operational we should look for a relatively lightly used heavy ice breaker actually capable of heavy operations, these can be had for a hundred million dollars or more but still a total budget outlay of one billion dollars spread over several years in the used ship market might put four or more ice breakers of varying capabilities into the Coast Guard fleet. And let us not forget icebreaking tugs as U.S.commercial endeavors pick up in the High Arctic these smaller ice capable ships may be the busiest in the Coast Guard fleet.
American Arctic researchers worry that the growing differences between the Russian and U.S. governments over Ukraine, Syria and other foreign-policy matters are increasing doubts about the Russia-U.S. logistical cooperation in science that bloomed after the Cold War. Renting or relying on Russian icebreakers is a threat to our sovereignty in our own Arctic Exclusive Economic Zone. Its time for some pragmatism, lets allocate a billion dollars to the U.S. Coast Guard for used ice breakers over the next 36 to 42 months. We can worry about building the biggest and best heavy duty icebreaker in an American yard once we get our economy back and have re-established basic ice breaking capacity and capabilities.
American Admiralty Books Safety & Privacy Policies
American Admiralty Books Safety & Privacy Policies
No comments:
Post a Comment