Thursday, July 5, 2012

HOW FAR WILL THE DRAGON SWIM?

Why, Mr. Dragon What Big Ears You Have:

The Dragon Hacks The Indian Navy's Computers And Makes Off With Classified Material
Update 5/28/2015: The Dragon has hacked many others since this post first appeared in 2012

 Dragons, like many reptiles generally speak with forked tongues. While the PLAN Dragon has been cooperating with the Japanese and Indian Navy on counter piracy patrols off of Somalia and exchanging good will visits with Japan and India the big eared reptile has been raiding the Indian naval classified material supply. Chinese hackers have broken into sensitive Indian naval computers and extracted sensitive data. The espionage occurred around Visakapatnaw, the headquarters of India's Eastern Naval Command. Planted bugs in that location captured classified information and relayed the confidential data to an IP address in China. 

 The Indian Eastern Naval Command operates deployments in the South China Sea and has completed four successful missions in recent years. India's first nuclear submarine the INS ARIHANT is undergoing tests at this command as we write. The extent of the data loss is still being ascertained according to official Indian reports.

 Every nation gathers intelligence on any nation of interest, we certainly gather our fair share. But, as we shall see in a near future posting, China has some risk involved in stealing secrets from the Indian Navy just now.  China and India are serious regional rivals, fought a short but bloody war a few decades ago, but recently have exchanged friendly naval visits as covered in one our previous postings. China is now engaged with India and Japan in a cooperative naval arrangement against pirate activity off of Somalia. The People's Liberation Army's Navy (PLAN or as we call it "the Dragon") was benefiting greatly from these two recent activities, appearing very much like a responsible law abiding global reach navy. Then they violate the official rule "gentlemen don't read other gentleman's mail". 

 Of course actually we all do read each other's mail at every opportunity except when being caught red handed risks loss we can't afford. Obviously the Dragon can't restrain its aggressive nature even while openly trying to mend neighborly fences. Even while the Dragon is off of Africa with its neighbors, and sometimes enemies, India and Japan trying to appear the cooperative naval neighbor it is sending its "surveillance vessels" to Vietnam again trying to enforce its claim to virtually the beach of Vietnam.

 We will post more on the PLAN Dragon in the near future, keep watching this spot. If there can be only one big power in the East, we pray it will be India, a nation not bent on central control of everything, or given over to deceit as an ordinary business method. India as a nation has never invaded any other nation. India is a real democracy and has since independence exhibited plenty of good old fashioned common sense, and good will in its rise in the world.
The Dragon fears India for exactly those reasons. 

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

DIVING:

 It's the Fourth of July! We Digress from Our Dragon Watch for a Day to Bring to You Some Images of Why We Love the Oceans. 

 If you have read our Diving and Technical Diving sections you know that we are strong advocates of serious dive training if you use SCUBA gear. What follows are some beautiful dives often using only only a face mask, fins and snorkel.

 Some of the grunt workers ("Library Elves") here American Admiralty Books are veterans of the Coast Guard and NOAA Corps. As such we share at least two things in common. First we love the ocean, and second we are concerned about it. Most people know something about the Coast Guard at least as a search and rescue organization, and most know after the BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico that the Coast Guard has a big role in maritime environmental protection.

  Outside of the ranks of professional mariners few seem to know what the NOAA Corps is and does. Professionals know about this smallest of all of the uniformed naval services because professional mariners use their products such as the NOAA navigation charts and publications such as the "COAST PILOT". The NOAA Corps is descended from a former organization originally called the "Coast Survey" which was formed immediately after the return of Lewis and Clark. There is considerable evidence that the NOAA Corps is in fact the direct organizational descendant of the Lewis and Clark expedition but we'll save that discussion for another time. We mention it only now to help our visitors to understand what the less than 450 uniformed officers of the NOAA Corps do that is different from the other naval services such as the navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard or the Merchant Marine. The NOAA Corps is a "Corps of Discovery" fielding surveyors, divers, ship and air craft pilots who get the maritime geographic facts, analyze them and produce useful navigational products that the rest of the naval establishment uses along with many other direct and indirect "customers".

 Members of both services inherit a "Guardian ethic". Both the USCG and the NOAA Corps have roles to play in the protection of marine mammals and endangered fish stocks with the Coast Guard patroling and inspecting the wild caught fisheries and the NOAA Corps operating and patrolling marine sanctuaries. So what do the Guardians of the sea do with a holiday? Generally we sail, fish, or dive. Today we thought we'd share with you some great videos of dives, some with a guardian ethic theme. Relax and enjoy. We'll get back to monitoring the pesky Chinese Navy shortly

 The first in the series is a video reminder of why whale and shark conservation are worth the effort. Click on the hyper link below for a real visual treat then hit the return or back symbol for more selections:  

Participate in Shark and Whale Conservation featuring Holly Beck and the Whale Shark
Run time 2 minutes and five seconds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO2k-l4yRz8


Shark Riding in Crystal Clear Water: Run Time 5 minutes, 8 seconds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucivXRBrP_0

But Remember they can and do bite, don't go shark riding without an expert guide, and then don't even do it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqYqroPZi-U

Because they even bite experts!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pjbH5OuBc4&feature=relmfu

But lets not forget that most of us , most of the time are simply underwater sight seeing, and what sights there are to see!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9PHRDzda20&feature=fvwrel

Have a Great Independence day ! Don't forget that freedom isn't free, for yours thank a vet and come back tomorrow as we continue to report developments in the south China sea.








Monday, July 2, 2012

HOW FAR WILL THE DRAGON SWIM? ARE WE CONFRONTED YET?

 Philippine President Benigno Aquino stated today (Monday July 2, 2012) that  he may ask the United States for assistance with surveillance over flights of the Philippines Exclusive Economic Zone  (EEZ).

 The Philippines and China had been in a stand off near the Scarborough Shoal for much of last month when an approaching storm gave both sides a safety rationale for pulling their naval, coast guard, and fisheries enforcement armed vessels from a disputed area of the collection of small islands and large rocks known as Scarborough Shoal. China claims the region which is clearly, in our opinion, in the Philippines Exclusive Economic Zone. (EEZ) (The area is located about 147 miles off of the Island coastline of Philippine Luzon and is much more distant from any Chinese land mass.). The Philippines is confident enough in their claim to be willing to submit the claim to an international tribunal. But China demands a "bilateral solution". China's "bilateral solution" appears to be on the order of "Hey! I've got this gun pointed at your head and  I want something you have". In our immediately previous blog on this swimming dragon we provided the below hyperlink to a video that illustrates just how fast China can turn a machine gun on unarmed sailors of nations the Dragon views as powerless or friendless.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uy2ZrFphSmchttp:

 The Phillipines are not powerless nor friendless but the Dragon is far more powerful as was illustrated in our last blog in the below hyperlinked Philippine produced video describing the comparative military strength of the two nations now locked in a territorial dispute. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5ZuX4TPD-k&feature=related

 The Philippines have described their legal case in the previously posted (June 25, 2012 in this blog) video. The hyperlink is below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBL8DsqZ6jM&feature=fvwrel 

 By contrast China doesn't appear interested in presenting a
legal claim, but continues to call for what it terms a "bilateral
solution" which appears to mean that the Philippines is
to agree to whatever China says.  In the middle of all this the Philippines, a long time ally of United States, has asked for American assistance with surveillance overflights of the area by P3C Orion air craft. 

 The U.S. has declared neutrality on the issue and China has issued a warning to all non party states to keep out of the area and the issue. This declaration by the Dragon looks to us as an attempt to isolate the weaker Philippines in order to be in a
better position to dictate terms. China said last week that it
had already begun "combat ready patrols" in order to
maintain their claim. China has declared that it is
"vehemently opposed" to the Philippine law described in the
linked video above. Below is hyperlink to some English language regional news coverage of the warning.

 The United States is very interested in
greater access to Philippine air bases. Such access was one
of the carrots held out by the Philippines to the United States
in exchange for the requested surveillance support. The
support requested by our ally amounts to protected "innocent
passage activity" under international law. But the Dragon, as
illustrated in the first hyper linked video of the Dragon's mass
assassination of unarmed Vietnamese sailors sometimes
shoots first and considers consequences later. Our P3C 
Orions could wind up being the trip wire to armed dispute in
the South China Sea. The South China sea is potentially the
hottest military flash point in Asia but it appears to be under
reported by our general media. American Admiralty Books
continues to suggest to all of our readers to pay more
attention to this region and its maritime conflicts. Below is a hyperlink to short video general view of the overall subject.

The area appears so troublesome that it is changing our outlook on our own corporate mission. We basically review publications in
the maritime field and publish informed opinion. We are not
basically a news organization. But the situation in the South
China Sea is so rapidly changing that we think we will have to
start at least a service that organizes and describes existing
competent maritime news services and hyperlinks them to
you. Look for some of our "How far Will The Dragon Swim
series to move to a "news source section " in the near future.
We are watching the Dragon and urge you to do the same,
we will try to provide better tools for you shortly.

Monday, June 25, 2012

Naval Interests Updated 5/28/2015

HOW FAR WILL THE DRAGON SWIM? HOW DANGEROUS IS THE DRAGON? THE VIEW FROM VIETNAM AND THE PHILIPPINES.
Rear Admiral Yin Zhou of the PLAN spoke out of both sides of his mouth in the ongoing controversy between China and the Philippines over the Scarborough Shoal area. He tolds the Chinese News Service (CNS) that Chinese Troops should board even Philippine Government, as well as fishing vessels in the area of the 2012 stand off, but "maintain restraint, not force, not hurt people" when boarding vessels in the area.". He then tells the Communist Party's "People's daily that the PLAN "will not hesitate to use deadly force against its enemies'. 

Watch our first hyperlinked video in this posting to see how quick and deadly PLAN forces can be against unarmed Vietnamese sailors. What does this tell us about the dispute between the Philippines and China over Scarborough Shoal?

Philippine Presidential Decree No. 1599 established a 200 mile Exclusive Economic Zone from base lines drawn on the larger main Philippine Islands such as Luzon. The disputed area is within 123 to 137 miles from this base line. It is nowhere near 200 miles from China. The Island was named for the tea ship SCARBOROUGH which sank on one of the rocks with a loss of all hands in 1784. The Philippines call the 150 square mile area of rocks and small islands "Panatag Shoal" or Bajo de Masinloc".  The Philippines built a light house on it in 1960s and refurbished it in the 1990s. Between the 1990s and 2003 the Philippine fisheries authorities arrested many Chinese vessels for illegal fishing in the area. The arrests, as are anticipated under present Exclusive Economic Zone law were not for simply fishing in the area but for using illegal methods and taking protected species. The Philippines before being pushed out of the area by the more heavily armed Chinese claimed only exclusive benthic (bottom dwelling) fishing rights and the right, duty, and obligation under international law to enforce migratory fishing treaty provisions against illegal methods and the taking of protected species. The Chinese gun boats now present in the area, treat it like the territorial sea of China. 

 The area has been shown on navigation charts compiled by English speaking and Spanish speaking maritime powers as Philippine waters since 1734 with up dates in 1808, 1820, and 1939. such Charts in any language did not show any Chinese name associated with the area as late as 1947. The Chinese base their claim on discovery of the area by Chinese Astronomer and Explorer Guo Shoujing in 1279. The Chinese did not exercise any administration over the area until their gun boats showed up recently. The Philippines ask that the "dispute" be settled by the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea. China insists on what it calls "bilateral discussions" which so far look a lot like the Chinese hold a gun to the head of the Philippines until they cave in and literally give the Dragon a foot hold on their beach front.  How far will the Dragon go with this strong armed robbery? We have witnessed this before when the Dragon opposed Vietnam over a similar area. Watch the video hyperlinked in this blog. The only fly in the ointment for the Dragon at the moment is that while the Dragon is far more powerful than the Philippines, the Philippines is not friendless being a long time and reliable alley of the United States. Watch the hyperlinked video comparison between Chinese and Philippine military strength.  We believe the time is long past for dealing with the Dragon's land grabs but that not only does the U.S. as leading advocate present issues of "face" to the Dragon, the Dragon's "First Island Policy" has parallels with our own "Monroe Doctrine, though their's is a sort of Monroe Doctrine on steroids. We never claimed any right to interfere with "innocent passage" or made any territorial claims. Too much pressure directly from the United States could worsen the situation. This is why American Admiralty Informational Services addresses India and Japan in the hopes that they will take the forceful lead in the region and speak up for their weaker neighbors.  Please read on and watch the hyperlinked videos for a fast background on the issues that could lead to peace or war in the South China sea.

 To India and Japan the Dragon is troublesome but so far it has proven a manageable threat. To its smaller neighbors who can not confront it from a position of naval power the image is quite different. To Vietnam and the Philippines the Dragon has been threatening and very deadly since at least 1988. Perhaps the best way to convey just how the Dragon is perceived by its smaller neighbors along the South China Sea is to provide you with videos on the subject created by Vietnamese and Philippines sources.  In our first hyper-linked presentation some of the video footage was actually shot by Chinese Navy photographers. We warn viewers that some of the images are difficult to watch, in 1988 Chinese warships opened the Spratly Islands dispute by literally slaughtering by machine gun fire unarmed Vietnamese sailors standing waist deep in water where they had planted their national flag in defiance of China.  China actually celebrates the incident as a victory and shamelessly photographed the slaughter of unarmed Vietnamese sailors and have shown the video of the "victory " enough that it has "escaped" to the Internet.  

 The closest point of land in China to the portion of the Spratly's depicted is roughly more than a thousand miles. The area where the massacre depicted occurred less than half that distance from Vietnam in a straight line from the coast. Historically the islands have long been considered part of Vietnam which occupies parts of the islands and has been continuously fishing the area since ancient times.

 Watch with us if you dare, the opening shots of the Spratly land grab by the Dragon, click on the hyperlink below, then come back to us for more views from the Spratly dispute.

THE OPENING SHOTS OF THE CHINA/ VIETNAM SPRATLY DISPUTE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uy2ZrFphSmchttp:



 The Philippines have good reason to fear the Dragon. The Dragon has already claimed sovereign Philippine territory. They are locked in a dispute with the dragon over the Scarobough Shoal group of islands. This area is well within 200 miles of the Philippines. Disputes between the Philippines and Vietnam over certain sections of the Spratly Islands have so far prevented these two nations from forming an alliance to resist excessively expansive claims by China, claims that China has proven willing to exert by blood shed. Even if the two nations could cooperate against the Dragon's intrusions, together they are too weak to resist. 

 The next hyperlink will take you to a Philippine video comparison of the comparative strengths of the Philippine and Chinese military forces. The previous video gives you some idea of the kind of treatment that the Philippines expect from China but for being linked to the United States by a defense treaty that is a constant source of anger for the Dragon. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5ZuX4TPD-k&feature=related

In contrast to the Dragon, the claims of the Philippines are mostly in conformance with the international conventions that govern territorial seas, contiguous zones, and exclusive economic zones.
In the short video hyper-linked below Philippine sources explain their domestic law on the relevant issues and state their argument that their claims are solidly based in international conventions and customary international law.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBL8DsqZ6jM&feature=fvwrel

 Finally, in the video hyper-linked below the Brookings Institute explains the interests of the United States and the complicated position we are in as any sort of deal broker in the area. 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xv5zrgPDmVA&feature=related

 The "Old China Hands" of the retired Naval Intelligence community that  American Admiralty Information Services have consulted with, agree that America has a high level of interest in the area. However, our interest is most direct in terms of the right of innocent passage through the area. Due to our historical close ties with the Philippines, and our relatively recent conflict with Vietnam, and China's jealousy over the leading position in the region; the United States probably can not be effective as a deal broker in the territorial dispute. Adding to China's face saving worries is its recent stern warning to the United States to keep out of the conflict. 

 In the first video we saw exactly how the Dragon deals with anyone who disagrees with them in the region if they are viewed as weak or friendless.  We see the only hope for peaceful resolution in a greater leadership role, including the role of arbitrator of territorial claims, on the parts of India and Japan. While Japan has some territorial disputes with China they are not in the vicinity of the Spratlys or Scrobourgh Shoal. India's interest is similar to that of the United States, namely general freedom of the seas; much trade to and from India passes through the South China sea, but India doesn't have territorial claims in the area. Most importantly India and Japan are serious naval powers, together they could well be dominant, the Dragon respects power. 

 While Japan is closely tied to the United States, India has held the U.S. at arms length. China "loses face" if it appears to knuckle under U.S. pressure. However by contrast China can be seen as dealing fairly with its fellow regional powers, neither one of which alone is in a position to dictate terms, but together have the type of power that the Dragon respects.  China is a Confucian state in the mind of our experts, who see a Confucian state as being almost obsessed with central control. Those obsessed with control have a natural aversion for losing face or exposing the iron fist encased in the silk glove. The United States is the wrong party in our opinion to directly deal with the misbehavior of the Dragon. We have our interests and we need to state them, but then we should fall behind the leadership of  a united front of Japan and India, so far behind that we do not appear as puppet master but as concerned party willing to abide by a fairly negotiated settlement that adheres to international law. The Dragon is aware that we have a big stick in the form of our Pacific Fleet if the Dragon should try to maul our Japanese friends, or the more neutral but trusted Indians. But we must avoid waving that stick about for the Dragon would rather die fighting than appear to knuckle under to a rival power that it feels it rightfully "owns" given the amount of debt of ours that it holds. 


 In the end however, the Dragon, the master of soft power knows that the massive debt is also a powerful weapon it has handed the Eagle. If the Dragon was to actually attack the honest brokers of India and Japan the United States would appear very legitimate in the eyes of the world in canceling its debt to China. After all it would hardly be a moral position to be critical of China's actions as immoral, illegal, and harmful to our allies, friends, and neutrals and continue to prop up their economy which fuels their armed forces. We would be relieved of a tremendous debt burden without any real damage to our international credit standing and cripple the Chinese economy in one blow involving no kinetic energy. When it comes to debt, sometimes the debtor nation has the creditor over the barrel. The big unanswered question is; will India and Japan join hands and  step up to the plate as powerful regional leaders?    



We hope that you will take the time to study the issues of the South China Sea. These are issues that could spell peace or war. As illustrated by the first video these are issues that some have already died over. The longest video lasts a little less than eight minutes. Invest a little time in obtaining the several different view points and relevant information on this important issue from our blog and hyper-linked videos. Tell others about this resource and the issues. Obviously we have an opinion on the issue and that is that leadership by India and Japan is critical. But we don't have all the answers. As the first video illustrates the Spratly disputes are the first place since the fall of Tibet where the Dragon has truly shown its teeth and fiery breath.  We will leave this posting up longer than usual so that our visitors may find it easily. Once we publish a new post this one will still be there you just have to scroll down. Please read, view, discuss, and give us your comments.  

            
  Shop Amazon - 2014 Golf Pro Gear                                           Shop Amazon's Kindle Accessories Store




Saturday, June 23, 2012

HOW FAR WILL THE DRAGON SWIM?

THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS CONTAIN NO GOOD NEWS.

Watch This Space Next Week For Shocking Videos Of The Dragon In Action.


  China is boosting its "coastal forces" in the face of continuing disagreement over sovereignty in the "second island chain". It appears the Dragon's definition of "coastal forces" includes forces sufficient to dominate the ocean from their beach line to the high water mark on the beaches of their neighbors. The bad news is that the Dragon has a very bloody record in pushing its perceptions of its "rights" against neighboring states that are either weak or viewed as weaker than the Dragon and Friendless. Next week we will post a video that shows just how ruthless the Dragon can become in pursuing its claims that clearly run contrary to international law.  We urge all of you who have been following our series "HOW FAR WILL THE DRAGON SWIM" To view this and the related videos next week which allows at least Vietnam and the Philippines to give you their view of the Dragon in words and images. We will warn you now that the first video in the series will show the Dragon literally machine gunning unarmed sailors in waist deep water. Its not suitable for younger viewers.

The good news , if there is any, is that the latest in Dragon "Coastal Forces" seem to be a ratcheting down from the prior use of heavily armed naval forces. The bad news is that seems 
to be simply a more sophisticated form of enforcing an illegal "land grab" and the apparently "kinder gentler" forces are sufficiently deadly to repeat the machine gunning incident that we will show you next week. 

 China is expanding its "Maritime Surveillance Forces". These forces are a paramilitary maritime police force separate and distinct from the Chinese Navy, the agency responsible for the the incident of mass murder at sea that we will show you next week. This new force operates under the State Oceanic Administration. Its larger vessels look much like our own U.S. Coast Guard's medium and high endurance cutters and are by no means incapable of high seas operations. By 2015 this relatively new force is expected to reach a strength of 16 aircraft, 350 vessels of various sizes, and a force of 15,000 officers and sailors.

 China recently used a vessel of this fleet to meet and greet an Indian Navy vessel transiting from Japanese waters towards home waters. There was nothing threatening in the "meet and greet" except an announcement that the ship were providing an unsolicited "escort", through what was clearly international waters. This new force is being operated in a fashion meant to imply effective Chinese administration over all of the contested waters of the China Sea. While the vessels are less heavily armed than naval vessels they have far superior weaponry than the fishing, commercial transport, research, other non naval craft they routinely shadow. One of their often used tactics for international commercial vessels that they know are on innocent passage is to come within sight, raise the vessel on the voice radio, and "welcome" them to "Chinese waters" along with offers of routing assistance, aids to navigation information, etc.. The idea is that they are building their case for "effective administration" of the entire area of their excessive claim. Unfortunately we fear that these tactics are reserved for nations with strong navies. Watch our video of next week to see how the Dragon deals with the powerless.

 As the "Maritime Surveillance Force grows and expands operations, disputes continue and grow more bitter between China with Brunei, Malaysia, Taiwan, and Vietnam. China claims over 648,000 square miles of ocean including all of the Spratly and Parcel Islands. In the incident that we will show you next week the Chinese literally machine gunned unarmed Vietnamese sailors waist deep in waters over a shallow shoal barely 200 miles directly off the coast of Vietnam and nearly 1,000 miles from the nearest point of land in China. The "crime" of the Vietnamese sailors? They were planting Vietnamese flags on the shoal which has been considered part of Vietnamese coastal waters and islands for about two hundred years.  

 The Dragon's expansionist ambitions are not limited to the South China Sea. A week before this posting one of their survey ships was spotted entering Japanese waters without the required notice provided for in a bilateral agreement between Japan and China over certain disputed waters near Japan. Once contacted the Chinese vessel then gave the Japanese Coast Guard vessel an explanation of its presence, its intended course and maneuvers, and finally provided notice as it turned to leave Japanese Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) waters.   

The Dragon doesn't seem to comprehend the difference between the territorial sea and an ocean servitude. The world recognizes only a 12 mile "territorial sea" consisting of an ocean area off of a nation's coast in which the adjacent coastal state exercises sovereignty as if the "territorial sea" was a piece  of their own land mass. Beyond this 12 mile wide "territorial sea" adjacent coastal states exercise varying degrees of control over specific activities to the degree that these controls don't interfere with the international rights of "innocent passage". For example for a distance of about 12 miles beyond the "territorial sea" there is a recognized "contiguous zone" in which adjacent coastal states have enhanced customs law enforcement rights. However to exercise those rights patrol craft commanders must have some form of "probable cause" for suspecting a customs law violation. For a distance of about 200 miles out from shore many adjacent coastal states have exclusive benthic (bottom dwelling) fisheries rights, and exclusive oil and mineral exploration and development rights. This area is somewhat coincidental with the newly evolved legal construct known as the Exclusive Economic Zone where the adjacent coastal state may have other exclusive economic development rights, but again subject to the requirement that such activities do not unduly obstruct freedom of navigation.

 Here is another way of looking at it. The surface of the ocean is open to navigation by anyone to about 12 miles from shore. For a nation's naval or coastal forces to interfere with any vessel navigating outside of its 12 mile territorial waters it must have probable cause that the vessel it stops or delays has violated a specific exclusive state right within a well defined and recognized zone administered by the adjacent coastal state. The relevant international conventions contain specific guidelines for special cases such as overlapping coastlines of neighboring adjacent coastal states and island states. Rarely are any of these limited exclusive economic rights extended much beyond 200 miles from shore. In the case of the dispute between the Philippines and China over the Scarborough Shoal area it is not disproportional though a bit of an exaggeration to state that China is extending its EEZ claim across a wide swath of ocean to the virtual beach line of the Philippines.

 When you see how China treated Vietnam in our posting of next week you'll realize why the latest pronouncement from China appears so chilling to the Philippines. Last week when Vietnam suggested that foreign states including the United States could have a role in arbitrating the various disputes over EEZ rights in the South China Sea, China's State Department issued a stern warning that all foreigners should keep out of the dispute. We believe that the relations between China and Japan and India indicate that China follows a two pronged approach to her ocean territorial ambitions. They keep the iron fist in a silk glove when confronting real naval powers like Japan and India, and simply punch the weak "right between the running lights" at every opportunity. 

 Now that they have publicly warned the United States and Western powers to keep out of their obvious land grab from their neighbors the hope that western powers could possibly drive a peaceful settlement are dashed. The Dragon has set itself up for a loss of face if it ever appears to be backing down from its land grab in the face of U.S. pressure. We believe the Philippines has escaped the treatment that China administered to the Vietnamese so far because the Philippines is perceived as under the protection of the U.S. Navy. Watch our second video next in Next week's blog on the Dragon to see a Philippine comparison of their military strength to that of China. We believe that the last hope of relatively peaceful and equitable settlement between China, Malaysia, Brunei, Vietnam, and the Philippines is the exertion of strong leadership and naval presence by a united front of India and China.

  China loses no face settling with these two regional powers who in combination have more military might than China wants to face down. The Dragon becomes the "Middle Kingdom" when faced with power and reverts to the astute use of soft power to further its goals. China would probably revert to soft power means to further its oceanic ambitions and scale back its time table if really confronted by a Japanese/ Indian front.

 We've been here before its called containment. China is not going to become a long lasting superpower. It is a Confucian state strongly acculturated  with concepts of central control. The Chinese have worked near miracles in the recent past but their micro management required to run everything will eventually cause them to collapse on themselves. They have gained a lot of ground in economic competition with the United States by painting us as "busy bodies". They base this claim on the fact that there are certain moral lines we will not generally cross in business, and certain people that we will not do business with, and certain forms of government that we hold at arms length. China's appeal is that if you do business with them they  don't care how you govern. Indeed China can be quite accommodating to the most severe domestic repression by governments it trades with. By contrast while our own record is not great, such actions at least generate protest among some U.S. population segments and the media.

 Domestic protest of government foreign policies is not a factor in China and there is no free press or media to protest. The Dragon simply can't go the distance as the world discovers just how ruthless it can be, and as it expends its hard won treasure on "control" at home and a broad. Most of the world in fact does value some moral principals in business.  The rest of the world simply needs to cooperate in suppressing the Dragon's appetites until it finally burns its lungs on its own fiery breath. India and Japan wake up to the Dragon on your door step, stand up for your weaker neighbors before the his divide and conquer game envelopes you, or a big power confrontation explodes on your door step.  Watch this space for a close up and highly visual view of the Dragon at work next week. We'll leave that post up for a while in the hopes that those of you who have been following the story of the swimming dragon will alert your friends, fellow workers, and neighbors to the videos. We'll make next week the Week of the swimming dragon and then we'll get off this subject for while to see if other opinions and view points re offered. But next week let's look at the Dragon as seen by his weaker neighbors.

Friday, June 22, 2012

Merchant Marine Interest:

AT LAST HOPE OF TWIC REFORM

 Editorial Note: June 1, 2017  This really was the last attempt at reform of the TWIC system and while the process for an original or renewal has improved somewhat the system is still in our opinion a dismal failure. We think most of the observable "progress" to date in the way of reduction of wait and processing times is simply the result of  the "pig in the python effect" of the initial issue population passing through and an over all shrinkage in the relevant maritime work force reducing renewals. The protracted time involved in the program's roll out has also inadvertently staggered renewal demand. Over all we rate the system, which doesn't even require proof of citizenship for card issuance a colossal and expensive failure. 

The Transportation Worker Identification Card (TWIC) has been a major irritant for the maritime industries and most especially merchant mariners since its inception in the wake of the attack on the twin World Trade Towers in New York on September 11, 2001. Merchant mariners are required to undergo a background investigation that they are charged for in order to obtain the TWIC without which they may not go unescorted through a marine terminal. Lack of unescorted movement through marine terminals effectively curtails shore leave and renders crew changes extremely difficult. 

 Of course, everyone understands the necessity for port security in today's environment, but unlike the truck drivers and others required to under go and pay for the TWIC process U.S.Merchant Marine personnel already have Coast Guard issued "mariner credentials" for which they had to undergo background checks and pay for the process. Thus U.S.Merchant Mariners, so necessary to our commerce and national security that the law classes them as a "naval auxiliary" are made to pay for both an occupational license and a sort of redundant "work permit". In the case of merchant mariners there seems to be very little security value added by way of the TWIC program and a great deal of aggravation and expense added to the lives of this already shrinking labor force.

 Now some hope of reform appears. House Resolution 4251 has been favorably reported and may be on its way to becoming law. This bill addresses a number of important shortfalls in the TWIC system. The legislation is strongly supported by the maritime labor unions and many in maritime industry management. The full name of the bill is the "Securing Maritime Activities Through Risk-Based Targeting for Port Security Act". " We urge our maritime professional readers to monitor the progress of this bill carefully. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Candice Miller (R-Mich.), Chairperson of the Border and Maritime Security Subcommittee. The legislation calls for major reform of the TWIC system before the end of 2012 when the first of the TWIC applicants will be required to go through the renewal process.The most important reform from the point of view of most merchant mariners is that the legislation requires that the process be completed with only one in person visit to the card issuing center.

 The bill also requires the DHS to issue a final rule for the installation of mechanical readers for the cards at the places protected. The lack of mechanical readers was one of the primary arguments that the cards were redundant with the merchant mariners credential. After all, if security guards simply looked at the TWIC as a photo ID from an agency that required a back ground check for issuance it truly was redundant with the Coast Guard issued mariner's credentials. To us, the next reform after this legislation should be the evolution of merchant mariner credentials that are TWIC electronic reader readable and the elimination of the entire second application, background check, and fees for merchant mariners. Well, we can still dream can't we?
           
  




Wednesday, June 20, 2012

RECREATIONAL BOATING SAFETY

COAST GUARD REPORTS A RISE IN BOATING FATALITIES

Update June 1, 2017:    This year it has been reported that 2016 was the worst year for recreational boating fatalities and injuries since records have been kept. The trend as we first reported here has been up for a number of years and we believe the principal reasons are still as described in this post. We also think that the advice given at the end of this post can still save your life.
 According to a recent report by the U.S. Coast Guard recreational boating fatalities rose last year to 758 reported nation wide , the highest number on record since 1998. From 2010 to 2011 total reported accidents actually decreased on an order of -1%, but deaths increased by 12.8% from 672 to 758. Recreational boating accident property damage in the same time frame totaled approximately $52 million. The fatality rate amounted to roughly 6.2 deaths per 100,000 registered recreational vessels, a 14% increase from last years 5.4 deaths per registered recreational vessel.

 Interestingly the National Mariner's Association reports that commercial work boat accidents are grossly under reported to the U.S. Coast Guard and has provided background information to the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Audits to that effect.
We have to wonder if recreational boating accidents might also be under reported. Often state or county sheriffs offices or state marine patrols respond to such accidents. Not all concerned are aware of exactly where the "navigable waters of the United States" begin and end. It seems highly likely that a significant number of recreational boating accidents never are brought to the Coast Guard's attention. Many recreational boats such as kayaks and canoes, stand up paddle boards, small rowing and sailing vessels are not "registered" recreational boats. Yet, there are probably quite a few of these vessels involved in accidents involving "registered recreational boats" on the "navigable waters of the United States.. Consequently we suspect the recent explosion in the numbers of these sorts of craft taking to the water may have something to do with the rise in fatalities. These vessels don't offer the occupants much protection when hit by a typical outboard recreational motorboat. 

 We are often skeptical of Coast Guard regulatory efforts and their various attempts at keeping and analyzing statistics, but we have a high regard for the efforts of the U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary in boating safety and what they call "preventative SAR" (Search and Rescue). The fatality rate had been dropping steadily for years as the Coast Guard Auxiliary's boating safety education efforts bore fruit. The U.S. Power Squadron, and some state boating law administrator's public courses added to the weight of training spreading through the recreational boating community. We don't think that traditional recreational boaters or "yachtsmen" are driving up the fatality rate. We think more "incidental boaters" who primarily see themselves as participants in "water sports" are now more prevalent in the traffic. While we view the Coast Guard's count of fatalities per registered recreational boat as possibly flawed by the failure to identify and deal with the registered on unregistered unplanned hull contacts; we find their list of causation factors and some other statistics offered this year as highly useful in addressing the practical problem of reducing on water recreational deaths.

 The Coast Guard lists as contributing factors in accident causation "operator inattention" "improper look-out", "operator inexperience", and  "excessive speed". However leading the pack of contributing factors in boating accident causation is "alcohol use". Alcohol was listed as a contributing factor in approximately 16% of the fatal accidents.  Of those who died in recreational boating accidents known to the Coast Guard 70% drowned. Of the drowning victims 84% were not wearing personal flotation devices (PFD often called "Life Jackets"). Most importantly, only 11% of the recreational boating accidents involved operators who had received boating safety instruction; and that does not mean that such boaters were "at fault" in the accidents they were involved in.

 So no matter how accurate the latest statistics, or what flaws may have occurred in their compilation and presentation, the fact of an increase in fatalities is clear. More importantly the causation factors are the usual suspects that the Coast Guard Auxiliary has been fighting for decades. We believe that the Auxiliary and its partners such as the Power Squadron, and state boating law administrators have reached in a powerful way the "traditional recreational boating population". We suspect that the rise in fatalities represents an increased presence of non traditional boaters who have not been sold yet on recreational boating instruction.

 In our various water sport pages such as diving, sailing, rowing and paddle sports we urge our book buying customers to seek out instruction and not to rely on just reading a book before engaging in these pursuits. The latest statistics from the Coast Guard underscore this advice. We would also like to add:

DON'T DRINK ALCOHOL ON THE WATER

WEAR A PERSONAL FLOTATION DEVICE AT ALL TIMES. DON"T SKIMP ON THIS, SPEND WHAT EVER IT TAKES TO GET SOMETHING THAT YOU REALLY WILL WEAR. ONLY THE PFD THAT YOU ARE ACTUALLY WEARING WHEN YOU GO IN THE WATER CAN SAVE YOU.

PAY ATTENTION TO EVERYTHING GOING ON ALL AROUND YOU IN AND OUTSIDE OF THE BOAT, PADDLE BOARD,  OR WIND SURFER. YOUR SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT WILL MAKE MORE SENSE IF YOU TAKE A BOATING SAFETY COURSE EVEN IF YOU ONLY PADDLE OR ROW. 

IF YOU DO PADDLE, ROW, OR SAIL DON'T COUNT TOO MUCH ON THE IDEA THAT THE NON MOTORIZED VESSEL HAS THE RIGHT OF WAY, THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS, AND BESIDES, YOUR RIGHT OF WAY NEVER EXTENDS THROUGH THE OTHER GUY'S BOAT.

 Be careful out there this summer. Read! But by all means take lessons in your water sport, be careful, avoid alcohol while on the water, buy a really comfortable PFD and wear it!  Here at American Admiralty Books we desperately want you to be safe on the water. Remember only live customers can buy books or be counted in our advertising rate justification statistics.

THE BOATING SAFETY BOOK SHELF

 Boating safety Kit