Wednesday, November 28, 2018

A SAIL POWERED RO RO?

https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/car-maker-partners-in-sailing-ro-ro-project

Concept drawing from linked article in MARITIME Executive

the Maritime Executive carried a story that we link you to concerning a partner ship between French cargo ship Operator NEOLINE and French automobile manufacturer Groupe Renault.  the partnership has plans to build and operate an auxiliary sail powered ro ro between france and north east american and canadian ports. The primary propulsion will be sail. But this sail plan will feature the computer guided and automatically controlled modern self furling type sails and not the labor intensive rigs of yester year. Read all about this exciting development in the maritime executive


Remember you can always find links to the MARITIME EXECUTIVE, and Other maritime professional journals in our news and intelligence resource section

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


THE CONTINUING CRIMINALIZATION OF NAUTICAL MISJUDGEMENTS

https://maritime-executive.com/article/american-cruise-ship-captain-fined-over-fuel-sulfur-content

THE MARITIME EXECUTIVE REPORTS:

American Cruise Ship Captain Fined Over Fuel Sulfur Content By French Court


alt
The Azura (file image) from the Maritime Executive Post 

BY MAREX 2018-11-26 17:20:00
 On Monday November 26, 2018 a french maritime court in Maeseille finded American Master Mariner, Capt. Evans Hout, of the P&O cruise ship AZURA $110,000 for using fuel with a sulfur content 0.18% above a disputed regulatory limit. While the court did rule that the parent organization of the P&O , Carnival Corporation should pay $90,000 of the fine we have to wonder just how much the French Court thinks an American Master working aboard a foreign flag ship makes in a year. How accurate are the testing methods of sulphur content that a tiny fraction of 1% of the regulatory sulphur limit is detectable and not disputable? Why is the Captain's part of the fine higher than many fines to individuals for full blown larceny related felonies. More over why is the French court enforcing this regulation now after informing the cruise industry that it would not apply to cruise ships. This is just one more example of how socialists Western governments are making minute details of of deviations from regulated maritime activity criminal. One has to wonder why anyone would want to be a Merchant Marine Officer today. We urge our readers to review the full story in the MARITIME EXECUTIVE. The MARITIME EXECUTIVE appears to be providing excellent coverage of the broad problem of near global criminalization of minor maritime operational missteps. You can always find a live link to the MARITIME EXECUTIVE and other maritime periodicals in our NEWS AND INTELLIGENCE SECTION'

Wednesday, November 21, 2018

WE WARNED MANY MONTHS BACK .THAT "NGO RESCUE SERVICES" ARE BASICALLY A JIHASIST FERRY OPERATION. ITALY APPEARS TO FINALLY BE TAKING STRONG ACTION.

Italy Recently Ordered The Seizure Of An NGO Owned "Rescue Ship"Over HIV / Meningitis / and Turberculis Infected Clothing Mislabeled as "Special Waste vice "Toxic Waste". 

  Needless to say the American MSM and the lefty media globally are promoting this as over kill and unkindness. We think it is a measure long over due. The offending ship the AQUARIS was at last report docked in Marseilles, France and beyond the reach of Italian authorities. But the charges certainly complicate the ship's ability to operate anywhere near Italian waters. The ship is operated by the NGO Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) which sounds a lot like "Doctors Without Borders" but its not. NGOs that continue to operate "Rescue Services" continue to encourage illegal migrant traffic into Southern Europe. They do not heed the instructions of Southern european National Coast Guards and are contributing top the problem and not helping resolve it. The Italian prosecutors fined the MSF and confiscated some of its assets in Italy. We go against the grain of the lefty dominated media globally here, but we applaud the Italian action. Below is our original item on the subject of NGOs as terrorists ferry services, some well meaning but increasingly simply Islamomilitant. 

ALL IS NOT AS IT SEEMS...RESCUE OPERATION OR JIHADIST FERRY SERVICE? 


File:Refugees crossing the Mediterranean sea on a boat, heading from Turkish coast to the northeastern Greek island of Lesbos, 29 January 2016.jpg


When does a rescue mission turn into a ferry service? KATIE HOPKINS reveals how the well-meaning groups trying to stop migrants from drowning may be risking the very lives they are trying to save



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4434182/When-does-rescue-mission-ferry-service.html#ixzz4fISxMyvY
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Monday, November 19, 2018

A DARK MATTER HURRICANE

A COMING "DARK MATTER HURRICANE? 

THERE IS A SORT OF WEATHER IN SPACE AND IT AFFECTS THE WEATHER ON PLANETS INCLUDING OUR OWN. We first published on this subject in our post:

THE NAMAZU SCHOOL OF CLIMATOLOGY:"THE EXOATMOSPHERE"

American Admiralty Books Safety & Privacy Policies   EU VISITORS WARNING POSSIBLE COOKIES AHEAD

Now the Great Catfish Updates us on a recent development
NAMAZU, GIANT JAPANESE CATFISH AND FORMER DEMIGOD IN CHARGE OF COASTAL STORMS AND EARTH QUAKES, NOW DEAN OF THE NAMAZU SCHOOL OF CLIMATOLOGY

Editor's note: We first published this post 2 years ago. The planet has moved a bit farther out of the former Exoatmosphere and winter is coming. We are expecting colder than recent past winters other than on the East Coast for quite some time now due to solar flare activity and the surface temperature inversion in the Atlantic of two years ago. The effects of the Solar flare activity of last year should wear off completely by 2020, but the effects of an Atlantic surface temperature inversion usually last 20 to 30 years. In any year the effects of a strong El Nino could cancel the effects of the solar flare activity and Atlantic surface temperature inversion in some places. But no one really knows how moving out of the relatively dense Exoatmosphere will affect weather or climate.The planet is changing neighborhoods and it hasn't done that in millions of years. Even Namazu with 3,000 years of weather observation admits to being a bit puzzled.

AND NOW: WE LEARN OF AN EXOATMOSPHERE EVENT KNOWN AS A DARK MATTER HURRICANE: 


Greetings Bipeds!
 In the past when we have discussed the various natural causes of climate change, including sudden and dramatic climate change, we have mentioned besides such earthly causes as ocean current changes, and volcanic activity; changes that happen in space. These changes may include such factors as change in the shape of the Earth's orbit, it's angle of inclination on its axis, solar flares and similar solar phenomena. We have not mentioned previously that the entire solar system is moving slowly through space. The planets and other content of the solar system are not all just spinning around the sun in place for millenniums, we are not only moving around the sun and in circles relative to  each other, the entire solar system is moving slowly through space. In the AAB series "SPACE AS AN OCEAN" the authors did bring up the idea that Space isn't just , well, empty space, though in a comparative sense with the Earth's atmosphere it isn't very dense with stuff between planets and stars. 

 As it turns out for quite some time now we have been moving through a rather gassy area of space. The gases are no where near as dense as even a thin atmosphere as found clinging to planets, but it is there in detectable amounts with modern technology. Scientists call the region of space that we have been traveling through for the past few million years "the Local Interstellar Cloud". For the purpose of our discussion here I've coined the term the "Exoatmosphere" to underscore the idea that this is gas beyond the atmosphere. Thin and wispy to a point of being virtually, but not quite actually nothingness. None the less, we can detect the stuff of the "Exoatmosphere or "Local Interstellar Cloud" and determine its relative "flow" direction and velocity. There is no doubt that this Exoatmosphere can have a dramatic effect on the weather in the Earth's atmosphere, and climate is simply average weather over protracted periods.

 We recently became aware that the exoatmosphere of space contains not only gases that may affect planetary weather but also collections of particles in various configurations. Astronomers now suggest that we are probably approaching a "dark matter hurricane".This "particle storm" will envelope the Earth on its way through the Milky Way galaxy that we are a part of. But without instruments manned by astute astro physicists we mere mortals are unlikely to notice the "storms passage". It's called a dark matter "hurricane" more for the size and shape of formation than for its destructive capacity in the world of non dark matter.

 "Dark matter hurricanes" are associated at least as far we know today with particle streams in space that we are just starting to understand. It is almost as if the galaxy we live in has eddies and streams somewhat like our own planet's oceans have. There are a number of what astrophysicists call "Stellar streams spread throughout the Milky Way. These are gatherings of stars that were once dwarf galaxies or clusters of stars. Millions of years before even the birth of myself, the Great Namazu these star clusters were torn apart as they collided with our Galaxy as it passed through space. The debris from that collision left a stream of orbiting stars that circle our galactic center. As our Galaxy passed through the area of space where it encounter these debris stars we picked up the stars that lacked the velocity to travel into and then out of our system. No doubt this is one of the ways that galaxies grow in matter volume as they age and travel through space. 

 Of course we aren't exactly sure what makes up dark matter. The candidates for component parts include weakly -interacting particles appropriately referred to as "WIMPS" , and what sounds like their opposites  "gravitationally -interactive massive particles or Gimps and something called Axions which are still more theory than proven particles. Scientists have a net work of sensors around the globe in place in the hope that as we are over run by the "Dark Matter Hurricane" they will finally detect the dark matter and be able to move it out of the realm of theory and into the status of proven fact. For the rest of us the educated guess is that it will be a non event.

 But then we don't really know. The point is that space isn't nearly as empty as commonly thought and as our planet moves through different exoatmospheres the things it encounters in space often have effects great and small on our planetary weather. As we originally reported we are moving now into a new region of the exoatmosphere than that which we have been inhabiting for thousands of years.  

 Well, as my sailor buddies at the AAB say; "stand by for heavy rolls". As we reported about two year ago, our planet's long standing relationship with the Exoatmosphere may be about to change. Astronomer David McComas of the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas believes there has been a shift in direction of the helium atoms that flow into the solar system. Think of this flow of helium atoms as a sort of measure of a more complex flow of atoms that we call the "interstellar wind". According to McComas if the direction change continues for  hundreds to thousands of years (something that no one can predict or determine with any accuracy at the moment) our solar system could be in for some big time change. This change in direction could signal a change in the heliosphere , a really big bubble of charged particles blown out by the sun in the solar wind that protects the solar system from harmful cosmic rays. The size, shape and effectiveness of the heliosphere is shaped by the balance between the outward push of the solar wind and the inward pressure from gas in the Exoatmosphere or Local Interstellar Cloud, otherwise called by real science guys "the interstellar wind." 

 As measured so far the perceived change in direction is small roughly about 6 degrees over the last 40 years (I'm not sure that before that we could measure these things). However if the flow continues in this direction the general current flow could shift to the other side of the heliosphere (what I have been calling the Exoatmosphere in this discussion) and distort its shape letting in more harmful cosmic rays that negatively impact life on earth. Now we all know that forests produce oxygen and reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere but fewer people realize that microscopic phytoplankton is the bigger photosynthetic oxygen system on the planet. These microscopic floating plants are probably much more sensitive to these cosmic rays than a sequoia. We could be in big trouble in the future (but probably not your life time) in terms of the oxygen content of the atmosphere. Now there is a climate change! 

 The more likely result may be a massive die off of the less cosmic ray resistant forms of life most importantly certain species of phytoplankton and an increase in the cosmic ray resistant variety with a lot of ecological instability during the transition. Climates change, its what they do , so does life. All states of apparent relative equilibrium are temporary, even if they last millions of years. Life forms including us who may be caught mid life cycle in one of these dramatic changes suffer.  

 We can't do a single thing about these potential causes of mega climate change. But we can do something about the results of such events. We now know that climates change and can change rapidly and drastically and we can't do anything about these planetary or cosmic change agents. We also know that the type of climate change that Al Gore talks about, if actually happening (a big if given the actual science) is beyond our ability to change due to global politics. The United States which never signed the Kyoto Accords continues to reduce green house gas emissions while others that did sign increase their production and continue to point their fingers at the United States.  So it is pointless to worry about the various causes of climate change. Change will eventually come regardless. It is time to do something about managing the negative consequences and protecting our large population centers. We can change building codes, flood protection systems, and food production/transportation systems to anticipate and compensate of such change when , not if it comes. These are the facts Jack












Saturday, November 10, 2018

THE GREAT CATFISH OBSERVES A LITTLE PUBLIZISED TRUMP MASTER STROKE


NAMAZU: OUR FORMER JAPANESE GIANT CATFISH DEMIGOD AKA "THE WISE ONE"

Its been a couple of weeks since the President announced to the sound of crickets in the lame stream media his latest slap in the face to the Russian Bear. The bear needed at least a bitch slapping, if not a right cross, over its misbehavior and constant violation of the INTERMEDIATE RANGE NUCLEAR FORCE TREATY (INF). Regan and Gorbachev signed the treaty back in 1987. The treaty was supposed to eliminate all land based  missiles with effective ranges between 500 and 5,000 kilometers (310 miles to 3,417 miles). In fact it did eliminate the US Pershings and our ground launched cruise missiles. It probably eliminated some Soviet intermediate range missiles. Unfortunately while the US spent the years between 1987 and 1991 deconstructing this portion of our nuclear arsenal, the Bear just kept on violating the treaty while successive US presidents did nothing in protest. "The Donald" has ended that situtaion. 

Citing Article XV, paragraph 2 of the treaty he pulled the US out of the treaty based on past and now on going Russian violations. We've noticed that all over the English speaking world they name streets after the bear "ONE WAY". "The Trumpster's" response in this case was simply "America First you fat hairy bear!". 


The straw that broke the camel's back was that the Bear has been testing and probably deployed their M729 cruise missile.  This is a clear Russian violation of the treaty. The Dragon didn't sign the treaty and has been building such "theater wapons" as fast as possible. So while the Bear assures us that we must act to recover our defensive position relative to "Theater Nukes", the Dragon all by itself, makes it necessary to respond to their threat with weapons formerly banned to us by a treaty that the Bear refuses to honor. The lame stream media has largely not reacted to this story as it doesn't jib with their Trump as Russian puppet narrative. Where they have been unable to avoid carrying the story they scream that the President ( you know the one the American People elected vice her majesty Killarey) is making the world more dangerous. Which he is if you mean more dangerous for the Dragon, the Russians, the Iranians and other world dictator wanna be types. 


The analysts who have chosen to interpret this as Trump making the world more dangerous, couldn't be further from the truth. The world is only becoming less susceptibe to Russian and Chinese nuclear black mail. Credibility is the key to nuclear deterrence. If all we have is the big city / region leveling weapons we are unlikely to use them in the face of a hit by a smaller though nuclear weapon that confines its damage to say the space of a major strategic air base and some immediately surrounding territory. In short the United States as a moral and ethical nation is unlikely to respond to a base killer with a city killer weapon. But at present we have no appropriate nuclear response to the weapons the Bear and the Dragon are actually building and deploying. 

The Bear and the Dragon are starting to see American gigantic strategic, vice tactical nuclear forces as not very credible. Both beasts see the US as lacking the national will to respond to a local force annilating attack with a nation killing weapon. Of course neither beast would hesitate to do so. Donald Trump knows every attack on America will be met with massive antiwar movements. The Bear and the Dragon are probably right. So we are left with no choice but to restock our theater nukes. Formal withdrawal from the treaty is exactly the right first move. 

Right now neither beast is willing to do anything but forge ahead emboldened by 8 years of the Obama cowardice. But the President's bold move serves them notice that they have started an arms race. The Soviet Union fell due to such a race. President Regan forced them to go broke trying to keep up with the US. This move by Trump gives them an out. They can eliminate the possiblilty of regime change as a result of national bankruptcy by simply ceasing the expense of building an arsenal we can rapidly out pace, and redirecting the funds to quality of life measures for their own populations. Trump is inviting the Bear and the Dragon to sue for peace or risk regime change at the hands of their own people. It's all of a piece. Tariffs, arms races, even the US finincial debt to China are all being used by this President to halt aggression. As a business man he understands that just as lenders have leverage over browers, big enough borrowers have leverage over lenders. 

No one expects that if China started a war with the US that we would continue to pay our debts while engaged in a contest of arms. We don't owe Russia but we were a big help to them after the fall of the Soviet union. We won't be very cooperative if they continue to be hostile to our every intention. We have nothing to fear from a new Cold War. We won the last one, we'll win a new one. The Bear and the Dragon know their best bet is to avoid a new Cold War at all costs. But the constant presence of our internal enemies and their determination to bring down this President reinforce the determination of the Dragon and the Bear to continue towards peer power status. The challenge for the American People is simple. Can we hold on to Trump and defang the Democrats permanently? If yes America will hold on for at least another one hundred years. If not, don't make any long range plans its that simple. 

------------------------------------------------------------------


Tuesday, October 30, 2018

SEALIFT STILL LAGS

USA MARITIME TELLS CONGRESS:

AMERICA'S SECURITY AND TROOPS AT RISK

UNLESS THE MARITIME SECURITY IS FULLY FUNDED

American Admiralty Books Safety & Privacy Policies   EU VISITORS WARNING POSSIBLE COOKIES AHEAD

Editor's Note 2/28/2016 Sealift remains a congressional and White
House non priority as it was in November of last year.

Editor's Note 10/30/ 2018 Still no chaange despite the change in Administrations and 
Congressional balance. 
File:USNS Bob Hope (T-AKR 300) at anchorage in Souda harbor.jpg
A BOB HOPE CLASS SEA LIFT SHIP,OFFICIAL U.S. NAVY PHOTO

Information courtesy MM&P's WHEEL HOUSE

One of the most critical issues facing America’'s ability to provide assured 
support to our troops overseas is the looming funding shortfall for the Maritime 
Security Program (MSP) in Fiscal Year 2014 due to a $12 million carry-over 
funding anomaly. Unless the $12 million anomaly is fixed and MSP is fully 
funded, U.S.-flag ships will be forced out of MSP, which will weaken our 
nation'’s commercial sea lift capability, send American maritime jobs overseas and 
cost the taxpayer significantly more because the federal government will have to 
step in to support American troops by providing commercial sealift capability 
itself.

MSP, which is congressionally authorized at $186 million per year, provides the 
Defense Department (DOD) with access to commercial assets--U.S.-flag vessels, 
U.S. mariners and global logistics networks--to support U.S. government sealift 
requirements. During the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the vessels enrolled in MSP 
carried 95 percent of DOD waterborne cargoes transported to the region. MSP 
participant carriers continue to provide essential direct support to American 
troops engaged in Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. Working with the 
U.S. Transportation Command within the Department of Defense, the MSP carriers 
have developed and implemented ocean and intermodal solutions via the Pakistan 
Ground Lines of Communication, the Northern Distribution Network and sea-air 
multimodal combination logistics. 

Without assured access to the vessels, crews and related intermodal assets that 
MSP provides, DOD would have had significant difficulty moving goods and 
supplies to our troops and would have incurred substantially more cost. The 
ability to access these commercial assets saves DOD a significant amount of 
money each year. If the U.S. government were to try to replicate this program 
through procuring and building such assets itself, it would cost $65 billion, 
plus an additional $9 billion annually in operating and maintenance costs. In 
other words, without access to the U.S.-flag vessels, American mariners and 
intermodal and logistics networks provided by the commercial maritime industry, 
DOD would have to acquire, operate, and maintain U.S. government assets and 
intermodal systems at a significantly higher cost to the American taxpayer.

To prevent this loss in commercial sealift capability, the FY’14 carry-over 
funding anomaly must be addressed. When Congress adopted its last Continuing 
Resolution, there was a $12 million surplus in the MSP account that gave 
Congress the opportunity to appropriate $174 million for FY’13 rather than the 
authorized $186 million, which artificially set the funding baseline at $174 
million rather than $186 million. With the $12 million in funds carried-over 
into FY’13 plus the newly appropriated $174 million, Congress reaffirmed its 
support for a fully funded MSP. 

There are not, however, any surplus funds remaining in the MSP account to be 
carried over and the funding baseline in the context of a continuing resolution 
for FY’14 is set too low to achieve the full funding as called for by the 
President and as intended by Congress. Consequently, to ensure that the 
Department of Defense continues to have the U.S.-flag sea lift capability it 
needs, Congress should correct this $12 million carry-over funding anomaly and 
appropriate the full Congressionally authorized amount of $186 million for 
FY’14. If it does not, and Congress fails to include the full $186 million for 
the MSP but simply appropriates the same $174 million as in FY’13, the Maritime 
Administration has indicated that an initial four U.S.-flag MSP vessels will be 
removed from the program, sending American jobs overseas and reducing the 
sealift capability available to the Department of Defense.

This potential funding shortfall is already raising readiness capability 
concerns within DOD. Commenting specifically on the potential FY’14 funding 
shortfall for the Maritime Security Program and the resultant loss of U.S.-flag 
vessels and American mariners, the current commander of the U.S. Transportation 
Command (USTRANSCOM), Gen. William Fraser, stated in a communication to members 
of the House Armed Services Seapower Subcommittee that “USTRANSCOM relies 
heavily on the significant capabilities the U.S.-flag commercial sealift 
industry contributes to our nation.”

Fraser warned that the loss of vessels in MSP coupled with “the loss of mariner 
jobs, access to the related intermodal logistics networks these companies 
provide and potential loss of competition in certain trade routes may degrade 
our current support to forces deployed overseas and likely increase 
transportation costs to the government.”

In the interests of our nation’s economic and military security, and to prevent 
the loss of militarily useful U.S.-flag commercial vessels and the outsourcing 
of American maritime jobs, we ask Congress to address this carry-over funding 
anomaly and to approve full funding for MSP at its congressionally authorized 
level of $186 million for FY ‘14. 

HELLO MONTGOMERY, AL ARE YOU STILL NAVIGABLE?

Open Letter 3nd posting

Merchant Marine Interest:  Reposted Oct.30, 2018 originally posted in 2013. Can anyone provide an update in the comments section? Are the locks still working. Any developments along these lines to report?

 Photo Courtesy Birmingham Public Library : Steamer at Montgomery

AN OPEN  LETTER TO MONTGOMERY ALABAMA


 Dear People of Montgomery:
    
  Thank you for being a place of shelter for my wife and I when we visited your city in order to avoid riding out Hurricane Isaac in a place below sea level. I thought of Montgomery because its' distance from the Gulf of Mexico's beach line was far enough inland that most tropical storms are seriously diminished in intensity before reaching your fair city. Your town is far from the reach of tidal surge and your elevation is such that drenching tropical rains generally don't cause wide spread flooding. This time, your town was also well east of the predicted points of initial land fall. So, logically Montgomery looked like a good place to weather a storm. 

  I also knew exactly how easy of a drive from New Orleans it was since I frequently paused over night there on frequent drives between New Orleans and Annapolis. But I have to admit that until this recent storm shelter generated trip I had thought of Montgomery as a sort of wide spot in the road on the way to Annapolis. Today I think of it as a destination.

File:Flag of Montgomery, Alabama.svg


 I certainly enjoyed the downtown bus tour out of the old train depot and I wrote about that experience in an earlier blog. I'm a military retiree from a combination of naval services and was able to visit Maxwell Air Force base, enjoyed the Maxwell club and was able to use my commissary and exchange privileges while in your fair city. I can certainly see why more than a few military retirees have chosen to spend their retirement in Montgomery. I can see why automobile manufacturers have chosen to locate there. But now I want to tell you about a heritage that you seem to have neglected a bit and show you how you may be in danger of losing an economic advantage that you once enjoyed and could well enjoy again. Unfortunately if you don't act as a city now, you may lose this latent asset forever.

 Montgomery has many advantages such as being a state capitol, certainly giving the city a stable employment base. The city's favorable business climate has attracted automotive manufacturing, and with more than one college located there, the city rests on a solid economic foundation from which it supports many culturally unique features giving the place an attractive quality of life. But not so long ago the city had another economic engine that has fallen into disuse. Montgomery was once a river port city. Classic steamboats called in numbers and frequently at the city front dock. The Alabama River which runs through the heart of the city connects the city to both a commercially viable cargo generating hinterland up river, and to the sea at Mobile about 100 river miles away. The commerce carried on the Alabama into and out of Montgomery was so important even well into the twentieth century that the U.S Army Corps of Engineers has constructed 3 sets of navigation locks and dams to assure favorable navigation conditions for towboats and barges to Montgomery and beyond. 



 Unfortunately in more recent years most of the cargo in the region suitable for towboat and barge carriage has moved to rail or truck. Rail and truck may be faster but they are not the most economic means of moving non- time sensitive cargoes. Along the Mississippi and Ohio grain moves south by barge more so than any other mode of transport. Heating oil and gasoline from New Orleans and Baton Rouge area refineries move north by tank barge to more than 18 interior states. The towns that serve as the river ports along these routes prosper. They are not in danger of losing their status as a port  by the coming federal budget cuts. What keeps them safe is that for so many especially on the Mississippi below St. Louis there are no expensive locks and dams for the Federal Government to maintain.

  It takes three locks and dams between Montgomery and Mobile to keep the Alabama navigable by modern tow boat and barge. These will be evaluated as potential targets for budget cuts in the near future. With so little commercial vessel traffic at present, their future does not look bright.
Navigability , even when mostly latent is a sad thing for a community to lose. There could be opportunities in the future coming again to Montgomery because of it's status as a potential river port that simply haven't been imagined in recent years. 

File:USACE Claiborne Lock and Dam.jpg

 First, the Alabama river system runs through the best agricultural area in the state. Many agricultural commodities including soybeans are most economically transported by water, not all such commodities are slated for export. But it makes sense that those products of the region slated for export should go to Mobile for transfer to ship.. The cheapest way to get there is by towboat and barge. The rising cost of fuel is driving more and more non-time sensitive cargoes to the river. What is lacking on the upper reaches of the Alabama River is the infrastructure. There are too few docks and river side grain elevators. Its a bit of a chicken and egg issue. You need not only a navigable river but also some infrastructure to generate river cargoes.
The increase in fuel costs will start some Alabama River valley bulk commodity producers to look towards the river but their first glance will not be promising because the of the lack of infrastructure.

 Besides future possibilities for bulk commodity movements Montgomery could miss out on future manufacturing opportunities, especially in the field of out size items. Have you ever noticed that you have never been stuck in traffic behind a Saturn Rocket, or seen one go past you at a rail crossing? This is because the fabrication facilities for such out sized items, and there are many more not connected with the space program, are located on navigable waterways and the items are shipped by deck barge and tow boat. Many such items simply can not fit on a highway or rail line. Auto manufacturers have found Montgomery attractive, manufacturers of out sized industrial items could find the city attractive for all of the same reasons as the car makers if the Alabama River that runs through the city remains navigable. The city is blessed with some undeveloped river front land. In the case of the manufacturers of the out sized items the lack of pre-existing on and off load infrastructure may not be an issue since many such items require special built from scratch facilities. What they have to have is a waterside location, on a reliably navigable waterway.

File:Saturn rocket component loading on Palaemon.jpg
 Saturn Moon Rocket Booster Being Loaded on a NASA Barge
 This will sound crazy if you don't know the market but Montgomery could be a "cruise ship destination". No, Carnival Lines Fun Ships won't be locking through to you but American Cruise Lines has small passenger ships already visiting similar places. Some of their ships definitely can make it to Montgomery and the river front dock park could probably accommodate these little ships with very little modification. Take a look at the line's web site: http://www.americancruiselines.com/?gclid=CMD3mMbMnLICFWVgTAodQEwADA

Boat - Miami Harbor 2

American Cruise Lines is already operating nearby in Florida. A Montgomery, Mobile, New Orleans itinerary is possible using the Gulf Intracoastal waterway and the Alabama River with no outside ocean passage. These small ships love to be able to advertise smooth water routes. They need some additional itineraries in order to continue to attract repeat patronage. Montgomery with its potential cruise ship landing right down town, and the down town being lively and historic is just the sort of place these small cruise lines thrive on. But if the locks are closed for too little activity any such future business must go elsewhere. Cruise lines are not in business to lobby for locks. Municipalities and states must do that job. Now a mini cruise ship dropping 40 passengers at the city front may not seem to have much more impact on down town than a tour bus load of passengers daily. But cruise ship passengers are different from the tour bus crowd. They arrived with their hotel. They disembark in the morning maybe catch breakfast , take the delightful trolley tour ( by the way Ray, the regular driver is a city asset and ambassador and you probably couldn't have a better one at the city front), then go back to the boat to freshen up and head back out for the Hank Williams museum. Many boat passengers will take lunch down town, and then reemerge to sample the night life. Small cruise boat passengers tend to have about three times the economic impact that tour bus passengers do.


Believe me I have so far only touched  on a few of the potential economic possibilities of Montgomery's  latent navigability. But today latent navigability is endangered navigability. Corps of Engineers budgets are going under the microscope and then the chopping block soon. Lose the locks, you lose your navigability.


When the budget axe falls those locks below Montgomery will be an attractive target. But there are some things the city and its citizens can do to protect Montgomery's navigation potential.

 First, you have a beautiful little river front park with a nice little paddle wheel excursion boat. That boat is a pint sized U.S. Coast Guard inspected "merchant marine vessel", piloted by a USCG licensed "Merchant Marine Officer". Give the little "ship" a Mayoral commission as "Montgomery's flag ship". Feature it more often in advertising the city .Use some city funds to promote the boat in Mobile and Birmingham. Most importantly turn the direction of its excursions around. Most of the published excursions go north. Attention needs to be focused on the south, specifically the locks. The Chamber of Commerce and others should help organize several trips per year to and through the locks. Yes that's "too far for a day boat with no overnight facilities". But other day boats such as the JULIA BELLE SWAIN have done this sort of thing.

 When these other "day boats" make such trips here is how they do it." The boat makes an 8 to 12 hour run then the passengers get off and spend the night at a bed and breakfast. These trips don't sell for $15 a ticket, they are usually a few hundred dollars but the folks who take the well planned over night excursions repeat the trips year after year. Surely Montgomery has  enough well heeled civic boosters to invest in a fun week end on the river. I'll bet dozens of Montgomery natives have paid thousands for other cruises including the lock transit through the Panama canal, "The path between the Seas Tour" as it is often advertised. Why not a weekend voyage to transit Montgomery's own Path between the River and the Sea, one or all of the lower locks. 

 Locks keep statistics. Cargo movements count, commercial vessel movements count, and passengers not only count but enjoy a priority passage. So each visit through a lock by your city's"flag ship" builds the record of the lock as an engine of commerce. The boat may need the installation of a swinging stage on the bow to facilitate passenger egress at relatively unimproved river landings where buses pick up passengers for transport to the prearranged bed and breakfast accommodations or small hotels. If need be the city may want to make the investment in the swinging stage to get the ball rolling. 


 Some locks that started as portals of commerce have survived after commerce faded because of heavy recreational boat usage. Encourage recreational boating on the river near the city and especially recreational boat passage through the locks start a cruising club to encourage through lock trips. Do whatever you have to, to get a marina and yacht club on the river above the dam and below the present river front park.



 Use the wonderful facilities and and personnel of the Alabama State Archives to build a photo exhibit of the waterfront's past history as an "intermodal" port featuring the rail road activity that still parallels the river and once interacted with commercial river transport. Put that exhibit up at the old train depot by the waterfront. In this way for a very modest investment you educate visitor and native alike to the navigational past of the city. Include in the exhibit some of the potential navigational future.
Adopt the attitude that inland navigation economic activity some times fluctuates but if your city had a navigational past, it is entitled to a navigational future, that the city is determined not to give up.

File:Alabama Capitol Building.jpg

Play the national security card. Montgomery is home to two major Air Force Installations with at least one flight line.  The major air bases in the Florida Pan Handle both Air Force and Navy get most of their aviation fuel from Houston refineries by tank barges traveling along the Gulf Intracoastal waterway. Find out if the local Air bases are similarly served. If not find out why not, enlist the help of local commanding officers in lobbying for delivery of aviation fuel by barge.
Thousands of barrels of it are passing west to east just one hundred miles south of town. A right turn at the Alabama river could bring the fuel efficiency and security of water borne transport to Maxwell, if they don't already have it. If they do its a major argument for keeping the locks operating. Such a secure and efficient fuel line could be an argument for the expansion of military air power in the area in the future. 


File:Maxwell Air Force Base.jpg
MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, NOTICE PROXIMITY TO THE RIVER 

 Nominate a "Commodore" to be the public face of the navigability preservation effort. Adopt a flag for the "Navigation District" maybe the flag of the city in the upper corner on a aquamarine field emblazoned with the words: 

"MONTGOMERY WILL NEVER GO DRY"

 Navigation is part of being a cross roads town. It can be part of becoming an even more major distribution center. Montgomery had it, don't lose it! Montgomery's navigability is a sleeping giant of an economic engine. It can awaken in the future only if Montgomery can successfully preserve it. I hate to tell you this but you have at best only until January 2, 2013 to get a head start on the defense of navigability. It will not be long before the next round of federal budget chopping begins. Do not let go of your municipal navigability status lightly, fight for it. All of Montgomery's future is worth fighting for!